Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 17.88 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
17.88 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 6.8%
Rank
11th
of 44 groups
All-time high
26.77 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
All-time low
0.9351 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1962
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Low & middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Low & middle income stood at 17.88 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is up 6.8% on the previous year and up 6.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Low & middle income peaked at 26.77 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0.9351 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places Low & middle income 11th out of 44 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.9351 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 1963 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 1964 | 1.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 1965 | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.4% |
| 1966 | 0.9661 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.7% |
| 1967 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 1968 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 1969 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 1970 | 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1971 | 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.5% |
| 1972 | 1.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.1% |
| 1973 | 2.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.3% |
| 1974 | 3 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.1% |
| 1975 | 3.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 1976 | 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 1977 | 3.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 1978 | 4.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 1979 | 6.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.6% |
| 1980 | 6.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1981 | 5.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.9% |
| 1982 | 4.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.6% |
| 1983 | 4.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1984 | 3.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.0% |
| 1985 | 3.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 1986 | 5.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.4% |
| 1987 | 6.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 1988 | 5.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1989 | 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 1990 | 7.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.3% |
| 1991 | 7.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.4% |
| 1992 | 7.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 1993 | 6.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 1994 | 5.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.3% |
| 1995 | 6.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 1996 | 6.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1997 | 5.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 1998 | 7.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.7% |
| 1999 | 5.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 2000 | 6.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2001 | 6.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2002 | 9.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.3% |
| 2003 | 19.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +105.8% |
| 2004 | 11.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.0% |
| 2005 | 17.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.6% |
| 2006 | 17.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2007 | 16.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2008 | 18.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.7% |
| 2009 | 20.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2010 | 26.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.0% |
| 2011 | 22.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 2012 | 18.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 2013 | 16.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
| 2014 | 16.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2015 | 14.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 2016 | 18.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.2% |
| 2017 | 16.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2018 | 17.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.1% |
| 2019 | 14.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 2020 | 14.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 2021 | 17.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 2022 | 16.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 2023 | 17.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9351 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 3.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 5.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 6.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 14.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 18.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 26.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 16.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.88 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
- 8 Syrian Arab Republic 171.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Ukraine 132.3 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 10 Haiti 128.21 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 11 Senegal 124.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 12 Burkina Faso 118.02 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 13 Uganda 116.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Guinea 81.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Low & middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 881.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.39 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.97 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.22 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.76 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 8.96 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 11.79 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.74 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Low & middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Low & middle income was 17.88 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 26.77 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.9351 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Low & middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Low & middle income ranks 11th out of 44 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.