Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in OECD members
OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 0.4198 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in OECD members, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in OECD members is 0.4198 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2022.
The figure is down 0.9% on the previous year and up 2,940.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in OECD members peaked at 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991 and was at its lowest, -0.0169 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2007.
That places OECD members 40th out of 44 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in OECD members, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.099 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.0757 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.6% |
| 1972 | 0.0808 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.8% |
| 1973 | 0.1107 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.0% |
| 1974 | 0.1656 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.6% |
| 1975 | 0.258 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.8% |
| 1976 | 0.2028 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 1977 | 0.1044 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.5% |
| 1978 | 0.3519 current US$ per square kilometre | +237.1% |
| 1979 | 0.2919 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 1980 | 0.4031 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.1% |
| 1981 | 0.2882 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.5% |
| 1982 | 0.0686 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.2% |
| 1983 | 0.3573 current US$ per square kilometre | +421.2% |
| 1984 | 0.1747 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.1% |
| 1985 | 0.1795 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1986 | 0.2802 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.1% |
| 1987 | 0.0839 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.1% |
| 1988 | 0.3493 current US$ per square kilometre | +316.3% |
| 1989 | 0.2105 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.7% |
| 1990 | 0.4472 current US$ per square kilometre | +112.4% |
| 1991 | 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +986.5% |
| 1992 | 0.7162 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.3% |
| 1993 | 0.4294 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1994 | 0.1368 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.2% |
| 1995 | 0.3787 current US$ per square kilometre | +176.9% |
| 1996 | 0.2281 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.8% |
| 1997 | 0.2259 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1998 | 0.0403 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.1% |
| 1999 | 0.1125 current US$ per square kilometre | +179.0% |
| 2000 | 0.1656 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.2% |
| 2001 | 0.0507 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.4% |
| 2002 | 0.0394 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 2003 | 0.1194 current US$ per square kilometre | +202.9% |
| 2004 | 0.3518 current US$ per square kilometre | +194.6% |
| 2005 | 0.4236 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.4% |
| 2006 | 0.4538 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2007 | -0.0169 current US$ per square kilometre | -103.7% |
| 2008 | 0.1316 current US$ per square kilometre | -878.7% |
| 2009 | 0.0403 current US$ per square kilometre | -69.4% |
| 2010 | 0.033 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 2011 | 0.0214 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0138 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.5% |
| 2013 | 0.0214 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.1% |
| 2014 | 0.0127 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.8% |
| 2015 | 0.1677 current US$ per square kilometre | +1222.2% |
| 2016 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +1049.2% |
| 2017 | 0.2428 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.4% |
| 2018 | 0.3006 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 2019 | 0.2693 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2020 | 0.3279 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 2021 | 0.4235 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.2% |
| 2022 | 0.4198 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.9% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in OECD members changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | +1222.2% | 0.0127 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1677 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2016 | +1049.2% | 0.1677 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1991 | +986.5% | 0.4472 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 2008 | +878.7% | -0.0169 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1316 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.1741 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0757 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3519 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.2395 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0686 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4031 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.7574 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0403 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.1759 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0169 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4538 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.3009 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0127 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.3904 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3279 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4235 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 37 Seychelles 14.7 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Israel 14.33 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Yemen 13.84 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 40 Vietnam 12.83 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 41 Cyprus 11.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 42 Philippines 11.88 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 Tanzania 10.88 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for OECD members
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 31.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 14.83 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 75.99 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.64 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 39.41 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 387.66 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 673.54 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 108.61 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 45.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 477.76 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in OECD members?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in OECD members was 0.4198 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 4.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 1991.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0169 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- How does OECD members rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- OECD members ranks 40th out of 44 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2,940.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.