Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Uruguay
Uruguay: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 0.0064 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Uruguay, 1968–2017
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2017, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Uruguay stood at 0.0064 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.9% on the previous year and down 98.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Uruguay peaked at 6.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995 and was at its lowest, 0.0063 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2016.
That places Uruguay 138th out of 149 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1968 | 0.1143 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1969 | 0.1714 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.0% |
| 1970 | 0.1714 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1971 | 0.1143 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1972 | 0.5142 current US$ per square kilometre | +350.0% |
| 1973 | 0.4571 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1974 | 0.3428 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1975 | 0.6856 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1976 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.3% |
| 1977 | 0.6285 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.1% |
| 1978 | 0.9713 current US$ per square kilometre | +54.5% |
| 1979 | 0.7428 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 1980 | 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.3% |
| 1981 | 0.7999 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.0% |
| 1982 | 1.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.4% |
| 1983 | 0.9713 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.2% |
| 1984 | 0.7428 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.5% |
| 1985 | 0.7428 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1986 | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +107.7% |
| 1987 | 0.6856 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 1988 | 1.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +91.7% |
| 1989 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.4% |
| 1990 | 3.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +257.9% |
| 1991 | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.4% |
| 1992 | 5.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.5% |
| 1993 | 6.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.8% |
| 1994 | 5.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.5% |
| 1995 | 6.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.1% |
| 1996 | 4.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.9% |
| 1997 | 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.2% |
| 1998 | 5.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 1999 | 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.7% |
| 2000 | 2.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.2% |
| 2001 | 2.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 2002 | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 2003 | 0.7999 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.6% |
| 2004 | 0.5714 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.6% |
| 2005 | 0.3428 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 2006 | 0.5714 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.7% |
| 2007 | 0.4571 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 2008 | 0.1143 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 2011 | 0.2857 current US$ per square kilometre | +150.0% |
| 2012 | 0.2857 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 0.2857 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 0.1143 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.0% |
| 2016 | 0.0063 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.5% |
| 2017 | 0.0064 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1428 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1143 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1714 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
| 1970s | 0.5714 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1143 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6856 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1143 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2010s | 0.164 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0063 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2857 current US$ per square kilometre | 6 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
- 135 Liberia 0.0076 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 136 Algeria 0.0075 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 137 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 0.007 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 139 Russian Federation 0.0055 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 140 South Sudan 0.0047 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 141 Kyrgyzstan 0.0041 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Uruguay
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 28,471 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1,127 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 171,336 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 1.14 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 120,619 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 26.21 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.11 million current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 390,659 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 886,704 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.87 million current US$ (2017)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Uruguay?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Uruguay was 0.0064 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 6.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 1995.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0063 current US$ per square kilometre in 2016.
- How does Uruguay rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Uruguay ranks 138th out of 149 countries with data for 2017.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 98.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 47 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.