Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Sri Lanka, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Sri Lanka stood at 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
That represents a change of down 64.8% on the previous year and down 77.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Sri Lanka peaked at 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP, in 2001.
Sri Lanka ranks 101st of 147 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per in Sri Lanka, year by year
| Year | current US$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -3.1% |
| 1974 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -33.7% |
| 1975 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -5.7% |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +163.9% |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -47.5% |
| 1978 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +450.6% |
| 1979 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +291.4% |
| 1980 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -60.6% |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -30.7% |
| 1982 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +36.5% |
| 1983 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -14.3% |
| 1984 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +113.8% |
| 1985 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +72.6% |
| 1986 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -16.8% |
| 1987 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -18.7% |
| 1988 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +10.6% |
| 1989 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -53.7% |
| 1990 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +108.8% |
| 1991 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -25.6% |
| 1992 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -11.4% |
| 1993 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +44.1% |
| 1994 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -55.2% |
| 1995 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -0.7% |
| 1996 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -46.8% |
| 1997 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -45.2% |
| 1998 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -8.1% |
| 1999 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -41.5% |
| 2000 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -18.9% |
| 2001 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -91.2% |
| 2002 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +90.5% |
| 2003 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +294.1% |
| 2004 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -8.6% |
| 2005 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +4951.5% |
| 2006 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -87.6% |
| 2007 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +73.6% |
| 2008 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +15.3% |
| 2009 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +141.1% |
| 2010 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -97.1% |
| 2011 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +187.2% |
| 2012 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +71.3% |
| 2013 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -70.4% |
| 2014 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +750.5% |
| 2015 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -56.6% |
| 2016 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -57.6% |
| 2017 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1.4% |
| 2018 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1.8% |
| 2019 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -21.2% |
| 2020 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -70.7% |
| 2021 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +129.1% |
| 2022 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -24.0% |
| 2023 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -64.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 8 |
| 1980s | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sri Lanka
- 98 Cape Verde 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 99 Albania 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 100 Lesotho 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 102 Trinidad and Tobago 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 103 Indonesia 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 104 Costa Rica 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sri Lanka
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 743,046 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 104,629 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.69 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 26.12 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.01 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 9.57 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 441,093 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 76.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Sri Lanka?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per in Sri Lanka was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2001.
- How does Sri Lanka rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per?
- Sri Lanka ranks 101st out of 147 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, belgium (current us$), per rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
- Over the last ten years it is down 77.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.