Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps in Euro area
Euro area: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps was 2.18 million current US$ in 2004. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps in Euro area, 1970–2004
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Euro area recorded 2.18 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in 2004.
The figure is down 30.6% on the previous year and down 50.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Euro area peaked at 5.20 million current US$ in 1998 and was at its lowest, -20,000 current US$, in 1985.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps in Euro area, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 20,000 current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 16,667 current US$ | -16.7% |
| 1972 | 13,333 current US$ | -20.0% |
| 1973 | 10,000 current US$ | -25.0% |
| 1974 | 163,333 current US$ | +1533.3% |
| 1975 | 316,667 current US$ | +93.9% |
| 1976 | 470,000 current US$ | +48.4% |
| 1977 | 285,000 current US$ | -39.4% |
| 1978 | 100,000 current US$ | -64.9% |
| 1979 | 350,000 current US$ | +250.0% |
| 1980 | 20,000 current US$ | -94.3% |
| 1981 | 36,667 current US$ | +83.3% |
| 1982 | 53,333 current US$ | +45.5% |
| 1983 | 70,000 current US$ | +31.3% |
| 1984 | 160,000 current US$ | +128.6% |
| 1985 | -20,000 current US$ | -112.5% |
| 1986 | 10,000 current US$ | -150.0% |
| 1987 | 20,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1988 | 40,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1989 | -10,000 current US$ | -125.0% |
| 1990 | -20,000 current US$ | +100.0% |
| 1991 | 680,000 current US$ | -3500.0% |
| 1992 | 980,000 current US$ | +44.1% |
| 1993 | 4.59 million current US$ | +368.4% |
| 1994 | 4.43 million current US$ | -3.5% |
| 1995 | 4.77 million current US$ | +7.7% |
| 1996 | 4.33 million current US$ | -9.2% |
| 1997 | 2.12 million current US$ | -51.0% |
| 1998 | 5.20 million current US$ | +145.3% |
| 1999 | 3.31 million current US$ | -36.3% |
| 2000 | 3.84 million current US$ | +16.0% |
| 2001 | 2.98 million current US$ | -22.4% |
| 2002 | 2.35 million current US$ | -21.1% |
| 2003 | 3.14 million current US$ | +33.6% |
| 2004 | 2.18 million current US$ | -30.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 174,500 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 470,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 38,000 current US$ | -20,000 current US$ | 160,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 3.04 million current US$ | -20,000 current US$ | 5.20 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 2.90 million current US$ | 2.18 million current US$ | 3.84 million current US$ | 5 |
Countries ranked near Euro area
More aid effectiveness data for Euro area
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 9.91 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 820,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.18 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 713.83 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.15 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 31.86 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 17.56 million current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 110,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 160,000 current US$ (2004)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 27.66 million current US$ (2004)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Euro area?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps in Euro area was 2.18 million current US$ in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps recorded in Euro area?
- The highest recorded value was 5.20 million current US$ in 1998.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps recorded in Euro area?
- The lowest recorded value was -20,000 current US$ in 1985.
- How does Euro area rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps?
- Euro area ranks 1st out of 2 regions with data for 2004.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Euro area?
- Over the last ten years it is down 50.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Euro area data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) with 239 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.