Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in IDA blend
IDA blend: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per was 0.311 current US$ per person in 2022. ▼ Falling
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in IDA blend, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per person.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in IDA blend stood at 0.311 current US$ per person.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 26.3% on the previous year and up 8.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in IDA blend peaked at 0.6639 current US$ per person in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.0861 current US$ per person, in 2001.
That places IDA blend 34th out of 45 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 53 years of available data.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in IDA blend, year by year
| Year | current US$ per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0.345 current US$ per person | — |
| 1971 | 0.3273 current US$ per person | -5.1% |
| 1972 | 0.195 current US$ per person | -40.4% |
| 1973 | 0.216 current US$ per person | +10.8% |
| 1974 | 0.3187 current US$ per person | +47.5% |
| 1975 | 0.5286 current US$ per person | +65.9% |
| 1976 | 0.4041 current US$ per person | -23.5% |
| 1977 | 0.4786 current US$ per person | +18.4% |
| 1978 | 0.4814 current US$ per person | +0.6% |
| 1979 | 0.3876 current US$ per person | -19.5% |
| 1980 | 0.2697 current US$ per person | -30.4% |
| 1981 | 0.5209 current US$ per person | +93.1% |
| 1982 | 0.4845 current US$ per person | -7.0% |
| 1983 | 0.4226 current US$ per person | -12.8% |
| 1984 | 0.5216 current US$ per person | +23.4% |
| 1985 | 0.5023 current US$ per person | -3.7% |
| 1986 | 0.4112 current US$ per person | -18.1% |
| 1987 | 0.3444 current US$ per person | -16.3% |
| 1988 | 0.487 current US$ per person | +41.4% |
| 1989 | 0.4453 current US$ per person | -8.6% |
| 1990 | 0.3717 current US$ per person | -16.5% |
| 1991 | 0.3819 current US$ per person | +2.7% |
| 1992 | 0.3138 current US$ per person | -17.9% |
| 1993 | 0.1941 current US$ per person | -38.1% |
| 1994 | 0.143 current US$ per person | -26.3% |
| 1995 | 0.1245 current US$ per person | -12.9% |
| 1996 | 0.1458 current US$ per person | +17.1% |
| 1997 | 0.1247 current US$ per person | -14.5% |
| 1998 | 0.1942 current US$ per person | +55.7% |
| 1999 | 0.121 current US$ per person | -37.7% |
| 2000 | 0.0952 current US$ per person | -21.3% |
| 2001 | 0.0861 current US$ per person | -9.6% |
| 2002 | 0.3023 current US$ per person | +251.2% |
| 2003 | 0.164 current US$ per person | -45.8% |
| 2004 | 0.2596 current US$ per person | +58.3% |
| 2005 | 0.4043 current US$ per person | +55.7% |
| 2006 | 0.6639 current US$ per person | +64.2% |
| 2007 | 0.2902 current US$ per person | -56.3% |
| 2008 | 0.2755 current US$ per person | -5.1% |
| 2009 | 0.2962 current US$ per person | +7.5% |
| 2010 | 0.3557 current US$ per person | +20.1% |
| 2011 | 0.3606 current US$ per person | +1.4% |
| 2012 | 0.2874 current US$ per person | -20.3% |
| 2013 | 0.3115 current US$ per person | +8.4% |
| 2014 | 0.2017 current US$ per person | -35.2% |
| 2015 | 0.1897 current US$ per person | -6.0% |
| 2016 | 0.2244 current US$ per person | +18.3% |
| 2017 | 0.2126 current US$ per person | -5.3% |
| 2018 | 0.1963 current US$ per person | -7.7% |
| 2019 | 0.1747 current US$ per person | -11.0% |
| 2020 | 0.1979 current US$ per person | +13.3% |
| 2021 | 0.2462 current US$ per person | +24.4% |
| 2022 | 0.311 current US$ per person | +26.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.3682 current US$ per person | 0.195 current US$ per person | 0.5286 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.4409 current US$ per person | 0.2697 current US$ per person | 0.5216 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.2115 current US$ per person | 0.121 current US$ per person | 0.3819 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.2837 current US$ per person | 0.0861 current US$ per person | 0.6639 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.2515 current US$ per person | 0.1747 current US$ per person | 0.3606 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.2517 current US$ per person | 0.1979 current US$ per person | 0.311 current US$ per person | 3 |
Countries ranked near IDA blend
- 31 Seychelles 1.65 current US$ per person compare
- 32 Mozambique 1.65 current US$ per person compare
- 33 Central African Republic 1.61 current US$ per person compare
- 34 British Virgin Islands 1.52 current US$ per person compare
- 35 Bhutan 1.5 current US$ per person compare
- 36 Ghana 1.47 current US$ per person compare
- 37 Samoa 1.38 current US$ per person compare
More aid effectiveness data for IDA blend
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 13.45 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 24.88 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 202.73 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 612.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 62.05 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 438.92 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 753.26 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 317.55 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 59.79 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 324.78 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in IDA blend?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in IDA blend was 0.311 current US$ per person in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in IDA blend?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6639 current US$ per person in 2006.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in IDA blend?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0861 current US$ per person in 2001.
- How does IDA blend rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
- IDA blend ranks 34th out of 45 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per rising or falling in IDA blend?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this IDA blend data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.