Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia
Europe & Central Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per was 74.01 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
74.01 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 8.7%
Rank
6th
of 45 groups
All-time high
81.03 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
-3.89 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2020
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia stood at 74.01 current US$ per square kilometre.
The figure is down 8.7% on the previous year and up 7,768.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia peaked at 81.03 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, -3.89 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2020.
Europe & Central Asia ranks 6th of 45 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1967 | 0.3598 current US$ per square kilometre | +9750.0% |
| 1968 | 0.1699 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.8% |
| 1969 | 0.084 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.5% |
| 1970 | 0.601 current US$ per square kilometre | +615.2% |
| 1971 | 0.9718 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.7% |
| 1972 | 0.095 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.2% |
| 1973 | 0.9645 current US$ per square kilometre | +915.4% |
| 1974 | 0.7544 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.8% |
| 1975 | 0.8713 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 1976 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1977 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 0.0018 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1979 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1980 | 0.2357 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +1320.9% |
| 1982 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.5% |
| 1983 | 0.0347 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.0% |
| 1984 | 0.0895 current US$ per square kilometre | +157.9% |
| 1985 | -0.2832 current US$ per square kilometre | -416.3% |
| 1986 | -0.2156 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.9% |
| 1987 | -0.1242 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.4% |
| 1988 | -0.1407 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.2% |
| 1989 | -0.2997 current US$ per square kilometre | +113.0% |
| 1990 | 0.307 current US$ per square kilometre | -202.4% |
| 1991 | 0.042 current US$ per square kilometre | -86.3% |
| 1992 | 0.0092 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.1% |
| 1993 | 1.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +10807.1% |
| 1994 | 0.472 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.1% |
| 1995 | 0.457 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.2% |
| 1996 | 1.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +163.7% |
| 1997 | 0.3009 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1998 | 0.5976 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.6% |
| 1999 | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +222.4% |
| 2000 | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2001 | 1.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 2002 | 4.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +173.1% |
| 2003 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.2% |
| 2004 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2005 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.7% |
| 2006 | 3.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.8% |
| 2007 | 1.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.6% |
| 2008 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.9% |
| 2009 | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.1% |
| 2010 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.4% |
| 2011 | 0.992 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.4% |
| 2012 | 2.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +154.9% |
| 2013 | 0.9406 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.8% |
| 2014 | 9.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +863.6% |
| 2015 | 8.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2016 | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.7% |
| 2017 | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.3% |
| 2018 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 2019 | -3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -426.5% |
| 2020 | -3.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2021 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -144.0% |
| 2022 | 81.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +4626.8% |
| 2023 | 74.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0694 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3598 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.426 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9718 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.3801 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2997 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6324 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0092 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 38.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 81.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia
- 3 Saint Lucia 8,601 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 8,105 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Lebanon 6,131 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 6 Dominica 6,017 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 7 Tuvalu 3,692 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 8 Ukraine 3,401 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 9 Naoero 3,311 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia was 74.01 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 81.03 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.89 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- How does Europe & Central Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 6th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 7,768.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.