Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per was 168.74 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
168.74 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 15.7%
World rank
34th
of 166 countries
All-time high
728.59 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2005
All-time low
21.85 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2000
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Sri Lanka, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Sri Lanka recorded 168.74 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is up 15.7% on the previous year and up 192.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Sri Lanka peaked at 728.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 21.85 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2000.
That places Sri Lanka 34th out of 166 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Sri Lanka, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 37.95 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 29.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 1963 | 29.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 1964 | 37 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.7% |
| 1965 | 77.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +108.6% |
| 1966 | 82.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 1967 | 121.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +47.6% |
| 1968 | 53.58 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.8% |
| 1969 | 44.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1970 | 134.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +201.4% |
| 1971 | 90.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.9% |
| 1972 | 121.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.8% |
| 1973 | 76.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.5% |
| 1974 | 112.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.0% |
| 1975 | 150.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.6% |
| 1976 | 208.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.5% |
| 1977 | 258.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.1% |
| 1978 | 402.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.7% |
| 1979 | 275.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1980 | 466.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.6% |
| 1981 | 523.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1982 | 531.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 1983 | 575.51 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.2% |
| 1984 | 485.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.7% |
| 1985 | 349.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.0% |
| 1986 | 343.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1987 | 347.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1988 | 450.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 1989 | 246.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.3% |
| 1990 | 68.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.1% |
| 1991 | 155.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +126.9% |
| 1992 | 121.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.4% |
| 1993 | 94.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 1994 | 78.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.3% |
| 1995 | 64.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 1996 | 64.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 57.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1998 | 34.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.1% |
| 1999 | 40.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 2000 | 21.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.8% |
| 2001 | 43.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.7% |
| 2002 | 56.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.7% |
| 2003 | 92.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.4% |
| 2004 | 86.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2005 | 728.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +738.3% |
| 2006 | 244.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.4% |
| 2007 | 490.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.1% |
| 2008 | 670.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.8% |
| 2009 | 398.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.5% |
| 2010 | 182.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.1% |
| 2011 | 186.89 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2012 | 82.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.7% |
| 2013 | 57.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 2014 | 70.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.1% |
| 2015 | 64.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2016 | 76.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.2% |
| 2017 | 46.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.0% |
| 2018 | 28.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.0% |
| 2019 | 22.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.7% |
| 2020 | 67.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +196.8% |
| 2021 | 48.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.7% |
| 2022 | 145.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.3% |
| 2023 | 168.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 56.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 121.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 183 current US$ per square kilometre | 76.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 402.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 432 current US$ per square kilometre | 246.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 575.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 78.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 34.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 155.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 283.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 21.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 728.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 81.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 22.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 186.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 107.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 48.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 168.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Sri Lanka
- 31 Ghana 217.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 British Virgin Islands 200 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Tonga 191.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Honduras 165.49 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Poland 161.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Burkina Faso 160.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Sri Lanka
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 743,046 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 104,629 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 10.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 3.69 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 26.12 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.01 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 9.57 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 441,093 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 76.61 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Sri Lanka?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Sri Lanka was 168.74 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The highest recorded value was 728.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Sri Lanka?
- The lowest recorded value was 21.85 current US$ per square kilometre in 2000.
- How does Sri Lanka rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
- Sri Lanka ranks 34th out of 166 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per rising or falling in Sri Lanka?
- Over the last ten years it is up 192.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Sri Lanka data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.