Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Upper middle income
Upper middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per was 53.04 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
53.04 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 3.4%
Rank
20th
of 45 groups
All-time high
54.93 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
0.0455 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1967
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Upper middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Upper middle income recorded 53.04 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.4% on the previous year and up 1,447.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Upper middle income peaked at 54.93 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0.0455 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1967.
That places Upper middle income 20th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Upper middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0465 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.4023 current US$ per square kilometre | +766.1% |
| 1963 | 0.7375 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.3% |
| 1964 | 0.745 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1965 | 0.1371 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.6% |
| 1966 | 0.1401 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1967 | 0.0455 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.6% |
| 1968 | 0.2712 current US$ per square kilometre | +496.7% |
| 1969 | 0.3092 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.0% |
| 1970 | 0.5991 current US$ per square kilometre | +93.8% |
| 1971 | 0.7065 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.9% |
| 1972 | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.1% |
| 1973 | 1.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1974 | 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.3% |
| 1975 | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.8% |
| 1976 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1977 | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.5% |
| 1978 | 1.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1979 | 1.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 1980 | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.2% |
| 1981 | 2.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.8% |
| 1982 | 2.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1983 | 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1984 | 3.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.7% |
| 1985 | 3.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.6% |
| 1986 | 4.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.3% |
| 1987 | 4.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.9% |
| 1988 | 5.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.6% |
| 1989 | 5.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1990 | 6.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 1991 | 5.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.8% |
| 1992 | 5.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 1993 | 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.2% |
| 1994 | 4.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.7% |
| 1995 | 3.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 1996 | 3.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.0% |
| 1997 | 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 1998 | 3.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.8% |
| 1999 | 3.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 2000 | 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.6% |
| 2001 | 3.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.7% |
| 2002 | 3.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2003 | 5.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.2% |
| 2004 | 5.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.9% |
| 2005 | 15.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +177.4% |
| 2006 | 5.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.4% |
| 2007 | 7.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 2008 | 9.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 2009 | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.8% |
| 2010 | 3.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.9% |
| 2011 | 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 2012 | 4.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 2013 | 3.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.0% |
| 2014 | 8.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +154.0% |
| 2015 | 9.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 2016 | 5.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.9% |
| 2017 | 5.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2018 | 5.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2019 | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.5% |
| 2020 | 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2021 | 5.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.7% |
| 2022 | 54.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +928.7% |
| 2023 | 53.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3149 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0455 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.745 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5991 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 4.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 6.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 5.06 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 28.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 54.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Upper middle income
- 17 Saint Kitts and Nevis 600.85 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Bangladesh 579.94 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Marshall Islands 548.01 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Maldives 520.38 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Dominican Republic 499.18 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 22 Syria 406.53 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Comoros 401.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Upper middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 264.40 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 114.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.36 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 24.06 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 518.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.80 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 607.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 175.24 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Upper middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Upper middle income was 53.04 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 54.93 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Upper middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0455 current US$ per square kilometre in 1967.
- How does Upper middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
- Upper middle income ranks 20th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per rising or falling in Upper middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,447.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Upper middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.