Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Mexico
Mexico: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Mexico, 1962–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Mexico stood at 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
That represents a change of down 74.3% on the previous year and up 114.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Mexico peaked at 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1964 and was at its lowest, -0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP, in 1967.
That places Mexico 142nd out of 164 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per in Mexico, year by year
| Year | current US$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1962 | 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1963 | 0.0008 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +9.4% |
| 1964 | 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +46.4% |
| 1965 | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -85.1% |
| 1966 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -67.7% |
| 1967 | -0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -191.6% |
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -101.1% |
| 1971 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +262.4% |
| 1973 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -91.1% |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +423.9% |
| 1982 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +585.9% |
| 1983 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +3.4% |
| 1984 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +17.9% |
| 1985 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +12.5% |
| 1986 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +131.8% |
| 1987 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -45.2% |
| 1988 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -18.8% |
| 1989 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -5.2% |
| 1990 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +5.4% |
| 1991 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -40.9% |
| 1992 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +130.3% |
| 1993 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -37.5% |
| 1994 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +4.1% |
| 1995 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +19.4% |
| 1996 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -17.0% |
| 1997 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -43.3% |
| 1998 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -0.6% |
| 1999 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -25.3% |
| 2000 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -38.4% |
| 2001 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -11.0% |
| 2002 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +159.4% |
| 2003 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +34.1% |
| 2004 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -3.0% |
| 2005 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +0.6% |
| 2006 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +5.5% |
| 2007 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 2008 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -16.0% |
| 2009 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -8.2% |
| 2010 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -73.0% |
| 2011 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +47.1% |
| 2012 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +342.0% |
| 2013 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -72.0% |
| 2014 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -58.7% |
| 2015 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1.6% |
| 2016 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +207.0% |
| 2017 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +14.1% |
| 2018 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -6.1% |
| 2019 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +203.7% |
| 2020 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -10.8% |
| 2021 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -56.9% |
| 2022 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +436.5% |
| 2023 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -74.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0005 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 6 |
| 1970s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 3 |
| 1980s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 1990s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 4 |
Countries ranked near Mexico
- 139 Angola 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 140 Albania 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 141 Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 143 Georgia 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 144 Czechia 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
- 145 Malaysia 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP compare
More aid effectiveness data for Mexico
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 6.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 50,627 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 8.90 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions -75.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.54 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 83.32 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 132.81 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 5.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.23 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 4.81 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Mexico?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per in Mexico was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Mexico?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0012 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1964.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per recorded in Mexico?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 1967.
- How does Mexico rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per?
- Mexico ranks 142nd out of 164 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, canada (current us$), per rising or falling in Mexico?
- Over the last ten years it is up 114.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Mexico data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.