Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) in Libya

Libya: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) was 21.65 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
21.65 % change on previous year
Change on year
up 138.9%
World rank
24th
of 122 countries
All-time high
171.27 % change on previous year
in 2021
All-time low
-92.31 % change on previous year
in 2015
Years of data
11
2012–2023

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) in Libya, 2012–2023

-10001002002012201720232012: 90 % change on previous year2013: -83.7 % change on previous year2014: 129.1 % change on previous year2015: -92.3 % change on previous year2017: -42.6 % change on previous year2018: 102.5 % change on previous year2019: 35.1 % change on previous year2020: -78.1 % change on previous year2021: 171.3 % change on previous year2022: -55.7 % change on previous year2023: 21.6 % change on previous year

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.

Analysis

The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) in Libya is 21.65 % change on previous year, measured in 2023.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 138.9% on the previous year and up 125.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) in Libya peaked at 171.27 % change on previous year in 2021 and was at its lowest, -92.31 % change on previous year, in 2015.

Libya ranks 24th of 122 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) in Libya, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), annual growth rate in Libya, 2012 to 2023.
Year % change on previous year Change
2012 89.99 % change on previous year
2013 -83.71 % change on previous year -193.0%
2014 129.12 % change on previous year -254.2%
2015 -92.31 % change on previous year -171.5%
2017 -42.61 % change on previous year -53.8%
2018 102.47 % change on previous year -340.5%
2019 35.14 % change on previous year -65.7%
2020 -78.12 % change on previous year -322.3%
2021 171.27 % change on previous year -319.2%
2022 -55.67 % change on previous year -132.5%
2023 21.65 % change on previous year -138.9%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 19.73 % change on previous year -92.31 % change on previous year 129.12 % change on previous year 7
2020s 14.78 % change on previous year -78.12 % change on previous year 171.27 % change on previous year 4

Countries ranked near Libya

  1. 21 Brazil 33.89 % change on previous year compare
  2. 22 Argentina 33.02 % change on previous year compare
  3. 23 Congo 23.12 % change on previous year compare
  4. 25 Iraq 19.79 % change on previous year compare
  5. 26 Ghana 14.9 % change on previous year compare
  6. 27 Ukraine 13.43 % change on previous year compare

See the full ranking of 168 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Libya

All data for Libya →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) in Libya?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) in Libya was 21.65 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) recorded in Libya?
The highest recorded value was 171.27 % change on previous year in 2021.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) recorded in Libya?
The lowest recorded value was -92.31 % change on previous year in 2015.
How does Libya rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$)?
Libya ranks 24th out of 122 countries with data for 2023.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) rising or falling in Libya?
Over the last ten years it is up 125.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Libya data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) in Libya. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-annual-growth-rate/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-denmark-current-us-annual-growth-rate/libya/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) in Libya</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 5,991 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.