Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) in OECD members
OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) was 151.55 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) in OECD members, 1971–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) in OECD members stood at 151.55 % change on previous year.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 33.8% on the previous year and up 58.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) in OECD members peaked at 507.14 % change on previous year in 1977 and was at its lowest, -257.89 % change on previous year, in 1984.
That places OECD members 3rd out of 46 groups with data for 2022, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) in OECD members, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | -30.08 % change on previous year | — |
| 1972 | -9.7 % change on previous year | -67.8% |
| 1973 | -19.46 % change on previous year | +100.7% |
| 1974 | -63.33 % change on previous year | +225.4% |
| 1975 | -43.18 % change on previous year | -31.8% |
| 1976 | 12 % change on previous year | -127.8% |
| 1977 | 507.14 % change on previous year | +4126.2% |
| 1978 | -55.29 % change on previous year | -110.9% |
| 1979 | 3.95 % change on previous year | -107.1% |
| 1980 | -81.01 % change on previous year | -2152.3% |
| 1981 | -13.33 % change on previous year | -83.5% |
| 1982 | 130.77 % change on previous year | -1080.8% |
| 1983 | -36.67 % change on previous year | -128.0% |
| 1984 | -257.89 % change on previous year | +603.3% |
| 1985 | 50 % change on previous year | -119.4% |
| 1986 | -193.33 % change on previous year | -486.7% |
| 1987 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1988 | 81.82 % change on previous year | — |
| 1989 | 300 % change on previous year | +266.7% |
| 1991 | 133.19 % change on previous year | -55.6% |
| 1992 | 57.79 % change on previous year | -56.6% |
| 1993 | -90.03 % change on previous year | -255.8% |
| 1994 | 207.01 % change on previous year | -329.9% |
| 1995 | 156.89 % change on previous year | -24.2% |
| 1996 | -4.53 % change on previous year | -102.9% |
| 1997 | 32.48 % change on previous year | -816.7% |
| 1998 | 45.41 % change on previous year | +39.8% |
| 1999 | 28.14 % change on previous year | -38.0% |
| 2000 | -28.53 % change on previous year | -201.4% |
| 2001 | 20.08 % change on previous year | -170.4% |
| 2002 | -26.27 % change on previous year | -230.8% |
| 2003 | -6.52 % change on previous year | -75.2% |
| 2004 | -35.6 % change on previous year | +445.9% |
| 2005 | -96.32 % change on previous year | +170.5% |
| 2006 | -65.22 % change on previous year | -32.3% |
| 2007 | 335 % change on previous year | -613.7% |
| 2008 | -4.6 % change on previous year | -101.4% |
| 2009 | 2.41 % change on previous year | -152.4% |
| 2010 | -22.35 % change on previous year | -1027.6% |
| 2011 | -31.06 % change on previous year | +39.0% |
| 2012 | 95.6 % change on previous year | -407.8% |
| 2013 | -34.83 % change on previous year | -136.4% |
| 2014 | 238.79 % change on previous year | -785.6% |
| 2015 | 46.56 % change on previous year | -80.5% |
| 2016 | 215.97 % change on previous year | +363.8% |
| 2017 | 65.11 % change on previous year | -69.9% |
| 2018 | 34.34 % change on previous year | -47.3% |
| 2019 | -97.15 % change on previous year | -382.9% |
| 2020 | 57.39 % change on previous year | -159.1% |
| 2021 | 113.26 % change on previous year | +97.3% |
| 2022 | 151.55 % change on previous year | +33.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 33.56 % change on previous year | -63.33 % change on previous year | 507.14 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1980s | -1.97 % change on previous year | -257.89 % change on previous year | 300 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | 62.93 % change on previous year | -90.03 % change on previous year | 207.01 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2000s | 9.44 % change on previous year | -96.32 % change on previous year | 335 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 51.1 % change on previous year | -97.15 % change on previous year | 238.79 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 107.4 % change on previous year | 57.39 % change on previous year | 151.55 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 1 Uruguay 900 % change on previous year compare
- 2 Botswana 800 % change on previous year compare
- 3 Algeria 314.93 % change on previous year compare
- 4 Sierra Leone 240.6 % change on previous year compare
- 5 Viet Nam 189.53 % change on previous year compare
- 6 Eswatini 176.12 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for OECD members
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 31.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 14.83 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 75.99 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.64 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 39.41 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 387.66 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 673.54 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 108.61 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 45.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 477.76 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) in OECD members?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) in OECD members was 151.55 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 507.14 % change on previous year in 1977.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was -257.89 % change on previous year in 1984.
- How does OECD members rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$)?
- OECD members ranks 3rd out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$) rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is up 58.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.