Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps was 167.07 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) recorded 167.07 million current US$ for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in 2022. That is the highest value across all 53 years on record.
The figure is up 334.4% on the previous year and up 2,597.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 167.07 million current US$ in 2022 and was at its lowest, -6.69 million current US$, in 2012.
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 24th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 330,000 current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 350,000 current US$ | +6.1% |
| 1972 | -120,000 current US$ | -134.3% |
| 1973 | -130,000 current US$ | +8.3% |
| 1974 | -10,000 current US$ | -92.3% |
| 1975 | 55,000 current US$ | -650.0% |
| 1976 | 120,000 current US$ | +118.2% |
| 1977 | 1.79 million current US$ | +1391.7% |
| 1978 | 830,000 current US$ | -53.6% |
| 1979 | 110,000 current US$ | -86.7% |
| 1980 | 20,000 current US$ | -81.8% |
| 1981 | 15,000 current US$ | -25.0% |
| 1982 | 10,000 current US$ | -33.3% |
| 1983 | 130,000 current US$ | +1200.0% |
| 1984 | -180,000 current US$ | -238.5% |
| 1985 | -200,000 current US$ | +11.1% |
| 1986 | -260,000 current US$ | +30.0% |
| 1987 | -310,000 current US$ | +19.2% |
| 1988 | -230,000 current US$ | -25.8% |
| 1989 | -150,000 current US$ | -34.8% |
| 1990 | 5.51 million current US$ | -3773.3% |
| 1991 | 15.40 million current US$ | +179.5% |
| 1992 | 22.96 million current US$ | +49.1% |
| 1993 | 130,000 current US$ | -99.4% |
| 1994 | 11.75 million current US$ | +8938.5% |
| 1995 | 26.32 million current US$ | +124.0% |
| 1996 | 36.72 million current US$ | +39.5% |
| 1997 | 46.83 million current US$ | +27.5% |
| 1998 | 58.26 million current US$ | +24.4% |
| 1999 | 49.01 million current US$ | -15.9% |
| 2000 | 56.51 million current US$ | +15.3% |
| 2001 | 61.53 million current US$ | +8.9% |
| 2002 | 58.77 million current US$ | -4.5% |
| 2003 | 72.98 million current US$ | +24.2% |
| 2004 | 41.52 million current US$ | -43.1% |
| 2005 | 19.09 million current US$ | -54.0% |
| 2006 | 8.10 million current US$ | -57.6% |
| 2007 | 18.13 million current US$ | +123.8% |
| 2008 | 16.96 million current US$ | -6.5% |
| 2009 | 25.99 million current US$ | +53.2% |
| 2010 | 25.10 million current US$ | -3.4% |
| 2011 | 36.34 million current US$ | +44.8% |
| 2012 | -6.69 million current US$ | -118.4% |
| 2013 | 28.17 million current US$ | -521.1% |
| 2014 | 34.62 million current US$ | +22.9% |
| 2015 | 45.12 million current US$ | +30.3% |
| 2016 | 30.16 million current US$ | -33.2% |
| 2017 | 44.13 million current US$ | +46.3% |
| 2018 | 73.39 million current US$ | +66.3% |
| 2019 | 29.17 million current US$ | -60.3% |
| 2020 | 19.31 million current US$ | -33.8% |
| 2021 | 38.46 million current US$ | +99.2% |
| 2022 | 167.07 million current US$ | +334.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 332,500 current US$ | -130,000 current US$ | 1.79 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | -115,500 current US$ | -310,000 current US$ | 130,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 27.29 million current US$ | 130,000 current US$ | 58.26 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 37.96 million current US$ | 8.10 million current US$ | 72.98 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 33.95 million current US$ | -6.69 million current US$ | 73.39 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 74.95 million current US$ | 19.31 million current US$ | 167.07 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
- 21 South Sudan 12.01 million current US$ compare
- 22 Myanmar 9.26 million current US$ compare
- 23 Poland 8.90 million current US$ compare
- 24 Latvia 7.64 million current US$ compare
- 25 Estonia 7.10 million current US$ compare
- 26 Jordan 6.14 million current US$ compare
- 27 India 5.07 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 227.32 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 75.39 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.22 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 12.13 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 452.60 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.56 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.39 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 495.74 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 437.73 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.13 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) was 167.07 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 167.07 million current US$ in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was -6.69 million current US$ in 2012.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 24th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2,597.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.