Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Low & middle income
Low & middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps was 1.99 billion current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Low & middle income, 1960–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Low & middle income stood at 1.99 billion current US$.
That represents a change of up 2.8% on the previous year and down 6.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Low & middle income peaked at 2.12 billion current US$ in 2013 and was at its lowest, 100,000 current US$, in 1962.
Low & middle income ranks 2nd of 46 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in Low & middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 130,000 current US$ | — |
| 1961 | 650,000 current US$ | +400.0% |
| 1962 | 100,000 current US$ | -84.6% |
| 1963 | 1.10 million current US$ | +1000.0% |
| 1964 | 2.70 million current US$ | +145.5% |
| 1965 | 3.19 million current US$ | +18.1% |
| 1966 | 9.58 million current US$ | +200.3% |
| 1967 | 11.41 million current US$ | +19.1% |
| 1968 | 15.29 million current US$ | +34.0% |
| 1969 | 30.80 million current US$ | +101.4% |
| 1970 | 37.30 million current US$ | +21.1% |
| 1971 | 36.08 million current US$ | -3.3% |
| 1972 | 45.28 million current US$ | +25.5% |
| 1973 | 70.68 million current US$ | +56.1% |
| 1974 | 92.71 million current US$ | +31.2% |
| 1975 | 110.64 million current US$ | +19.3% |
| 1976 | 117.02 million current US$ | +5.8% |
| 1977 | 146.91 million current US$ | +25.5% |
| 1978 | 217.35 million current US$ | +47.9% |
| 1979 | 259.49 million current US$ | +19.4% |
| 1980 | 265.91 million current US$ | +2.5% |
| 1981 | 202.48 million current US$ | -23.9% |
| 1982 | 214.25 million current US$ | +5.8% |
| 1983 | 232.28 million current US$ | +8.4% |
| 1984 | 222.17 million current US$ | -4.4% |
| 1985 | 226.21 million current US$ | +1.8% |
| 1986 | 362.19 million current US$ | +60.1% |
| 1987 | 458.34 million current US$ | +26.5% |
| 1988 | 472.51 million current US$ | +3.1% |
| 1989 | 517.95 million current US$ | +9.6% |
| 1990 | 693.67 million current US$ | +33.9% |
| 1991 | 683.94 million current US$ | -1.4% |
| 1992 | 746.62 million current US$ | +9.2% |
| 1993 | 736.71 million current US$ | -1.3% |
| 1994 | 797.73 million current US$ | +8.3% |
| 1995 | 888.73 million current US$ | +11.4% |
| 1996 | 1.05 billion current US$ | +18.4% |
| 1997 | 999.94 million current US$ | -5.0% |
| 1998 | 1.00 billion current US$ | +0.3% |
| 1999 | 1.02 billion current US$ | +1.5% |
| 2000 | 1.02 billion current US$ | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1.03 billion current US$ | +1.1% |
| 2002 | 1.03 billion current US$ | +0.2% |
| 2003 | 1.03 billion current US$ | -0.4% |
| 2004 | 1.20 billion current US$ | +16.6% |
| 2005 | 1.35 billion current US$ | +12.8% |
| 2006 | 1.46 billion current US$ | +8.1% |
| 2007 | 1.64 billion current US$ | +12.4% |
| 2008 | 1.82 billion current US$ | +10.8% |
| 2009 | 1.89 billion current US$ | +3.8% |
| 2010 | 2.10 billion current US$ | +11.1% |
| 2011 | 2.12 billion current US$ | +1.0% |
| 2012 | 1.91 billion current US$ | -9.9% |
| 2013 | 2.12 billion current US$ | +11.0% |
| 2014 | 2.11 billion current US$ | -0.4% |
| 2015 | 1.87 billion current US$ | -11.3% |
| 2016 | 1.64 billion current US$ | -12.7% |
| 2017 | 1.69 billion current US$ | +3.3% |
| 2018 | 1.77 billion current US$ | +4.8% |
| 2019 | 1.66 billion current US$ | -6.3% |
| 2020 | 1.63 billion current US$ | -1.6% |
| 2021 | 1.94 billion current US$ | +18.8% |
| 2022 | 1.94 billion current US$ | -0.0% |
| 2023 | 1.99 billion current US$ | +2.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.50 million current US$ | 100,000 current US$ | 30.80 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 113.35 million current US$ | 36.08 million current US$ | 259.49 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 317.43 million current US$ | 202.48 million current US$ | 517.95 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 862.17 million current US$ | 683.94 million current US$ | 1.05 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.35 billion current US$ | 1.02 billion current US$ | 1.89 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.90 billion current US$ | 1.64 billion current US$ | 2.12 billion current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.88 billion current US$ | 1.63 billion current US$ | 1.99 billion current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Low & middle income
More aid effectiveness data for Low & middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 881.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.39 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.97 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 37.22 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 4.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 24.76 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 8.96 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 11.79 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 2.57 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 14.74 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Low & middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in Low & middle income was 1.99 billion current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in Low & middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 2.12 billion current US$ in 2013.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in Low & middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 100,000 current US$ in 1962.
- How does Low & middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- Low & middle income ranks 2nd out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Low & middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 6.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Low & middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.