Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in OECD members
OECD members: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps was 9.71 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in OECD members, 1970–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in OECD members stood at 9.71 million current US$.
That represents a change of up 151.6% on the previous year and up 445.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in OECD members peaked at 82.15 million current US$ in 1999 and was at its lowest, -440,000 current US$, in 1986.
OECD members ranks 36th of 46 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps in OECD members, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 2.36 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 1.65 million current US$ | -30.1% |
| 1972 | 1.49 million current US$ | -9.7% |
| 1973 | 1.20 million current US$ | -19.5% |
| 1974 | 440,000 current US$ | -63.3% |
| 1975 | 250,000 current US$ | -43.2% |
| 1976 | 280,000 current US$ | +12.0% |
| 1977 | 1.70 million current US$ | +507.1% |
| 1978 | 760,000 current US$ | -55.3% |
| 1979 | 790,000 current US$ | +3.9% |
| 1980 | 150,000 current US$ | -81.0% |
| 1981 | 130,000 current US$ | -13.3% |
| 1982 | 300,000 current US$ | +130.8% |
| 1983 | 190,000 current US$ | -36.7% |
| 1984 | -300,000 current US$ | -257.9% |
| 1985 | -150,000 current US$ | -50.0% |
| 1986 | -440,000 current US$ | +193.3% |
| 1987 | -440,000 current US$ | -0.0% |
| 1988 | -80,000 current US$ | -81.8% |
| 1989 | 160,000 current US$ | -300.0% |
| 1990 | 12.05 million current US$ | +7431.2% |
| 1991 | 28.10 million current US$ | +133.2% |
| 1992 | 44.34 million current US$ | +57.8% |
| 1993 | 4.42 million current US$ | -90.0% |
| 1994 | 13.57 million current US$ | +207.0% |
| 1995 | 34.86 million current US$ | +156.9% |
| 1996 | 33.28 million current US$ | -4.5% |
| 1997 | 44.09 million current US$ | +32.5% |
| 1998 | 64.11 million current US$ | +45.4% |
| 1999 | 82.15 million current US$ | +28.1% |
| 2000 | 58.71 million current US$ | -28.5% |
| 2001 | 70.50 million current US$ | +20.1% |
| 2002 | 51.98 million current US$ | -26.3% |
| 2003 | 48.59 million current US$ | -6.5% |
| 2004 | 31.29 million current US$ | -35.6% |
| 2005 | 1.15 million current US$ | -96.3% |
| 2006 | 400,000 current US$ | -65.2% |
| 2007 | 1.74 million current US$ | +335.0% |
| 2008 | 1.66 million current US$ | -4.6% |
| 2009 | 1.70 million current US$ | +2.4% |
| 2010 | 1.32 million current US$ | -22.4% |
| 2011 | 910,000 current US$ | -31.1% |
| 2012 | 1.78 million current US$ | +95.6% |
| 2013 | 1.16 million current US$ | -34.8% |
| 2014 | 3.93 million current US$ | +238.8% |
| 2015 | 5.76 million current US$ | +46.6% |
| 2016 | 18.20 million current US$ | +216.0% |
| 2017 | 30.05 million current US$ | +65.1% |
| 2018 | 40.37 million current US$ | +34.3% |
| 2019 | 1.15 million current US$ | -97.2% |
| 2020 | 1.81 million current US$ | +57.4% |
| 2021 | 3.86 million current US$ | +113.3% |
| 2022 | 9.71 million current US$ | +151.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.09 million current US$ | 250,000 current US$ | 2.36 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | -48,000 current US$ | -440,000 current US$ | 300,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 36.10 million current US$ | 4.42 million current US$ | 82.15 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 26.77 million current US$ | 400,000 current US$ | 70.50 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 10.46 million current US$ | 910,000 current US$ | 40.37 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 5.13 million current US$ | 1.81 million current US$ | 9.71 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near OECD members
- 33 Indonesia 3.57 million current US$ compare
- 34 Cuba 3.43 million current US$ compare
- 35 Nigeria 3.04 million current US$ compare
- 36 Georgia 2.76 million current US$ compare
- 37 Nepal 2.60 million current US$ compare
- 38 Brazil 2.58 million current US$ compare
- 39 Bulgaria 2.39 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for OECD members
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 31.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 14.83 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 75.99 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.64 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 39.41 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 387.66 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 673.54 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 108.61 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 45.96 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 477.76 million current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in OECD members?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps in OECD members was 9.71 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in OECD members?
- The highest recorded value was 82.15 million current US$ in 1999.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps recorded in OECD members?
- The lowest recorded value was -440,000 current US$ in 1986.
- How does OECD members rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps?
- OECD members ranks 36th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), gaps rising or falling in OECD members?
- Over the last ten years it is up 445.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this OECD members data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) with 378 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.