Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific
East Asia & Pacific: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 0.8466 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
East Asia & Pacific recorded 0.8466 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of down 15.0% on the previous year and down 72.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific peaked at 6.26 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005 and was at its lowest, 0 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1963.
That places East Asia & Pacific 36th out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in East Asia & Pacific, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0234 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.023 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.8% |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1964 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0.0295 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0.0111 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.5% |
| 1967 | 0.023 current US$ per square kilometre | +107.4% |
| 1968 | 0.043 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.5% |
| 1969 | 0.0545 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.7% |
| 1970 | 0.0873 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.2% |
| 1971 | 0.2652 current US$ per square kilometre | +203.8% |
| 1972 | 0.3824 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.2% |
| 1973 | 0.2201 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.4% |
| 1974 | 0.573 current US$ per square kilometre | +160.3% |
| 1975 | 0.653 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 1976 | 0.7764 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 1977 | 0.5862 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 1978 | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +202.2% |
| 1979 | 1.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.6% |
| 1980 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.2% |
| 1981 | 0.9858 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 1982 | 0.6382 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.3% |
| 1983 | 0.4218 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.9% |
| 1984 | 0.312 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.0% |
| 1985 | 0.851 current US$ per square kilometre | +172.8% |
| 1986 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.3% |
| 1987 | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1988 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1989 | 0.9617 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 1990 | 0.9179 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1991 | 0.9084 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 1992 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.3% |
| 1993 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 1994 | 1.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.6% |
| 1995 | 2.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.6% |
| 1996 | 3.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +71.3% |
| 1997 | 4.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1998 | 2.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.7% |
| 1999 | 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.6% |
| 2000 | 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 2001 | 4.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.3% |
| 2002 | 4.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2003 | 3.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 2004 | 5.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +59.8% |
| 2005 | 6.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2006 | 5.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.3% |
| 2007 | 4.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 2008 | 5.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.1% |
| 2009 | 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.9% |
| 2010 | 4.87 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.5% |
| 2011 | 5.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 2012 | 3.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.7% |
| 2013 | 3.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.7% |
| 2014 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 2015 | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.1% |
| 2016 | 0.917 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.4% |
| 2017 | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.8% |
| 2018 | 1.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 2019 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 2020 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 2021 | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2022 | 0.9954 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.7% |
| 2023 | 0.8466 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.023 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0545 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.6916 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0873 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.9114 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.312 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9084 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 4.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 2.6 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.917 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.8466 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near East Asia & Pacific
- 33 Bulgaria 21.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Malawi 19.3 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 South Sudan 19.01 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 36 Nepal 18.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Türkiye 17.99 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Samoa 17.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Ghana 16.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for East Asia & Pacific
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 34.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 13.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 230.20 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 613.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 130.05 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 604.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 550.19 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 77.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 5.61 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.61 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in East Asia & Pacific was 0.8466 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The highest recorded value was 6.26 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in East Asia & Pacific?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 1963.
- How does East Asia & Pacific rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 36th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in East Asia & Pacific?
- Over the last ten years it is down 72.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this East Asia & Pacific data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.