Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia
Europe & Central Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 7.63 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
7.63 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 25.3%
Rank
26th
of 46 groups
All-time high
7.63 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
-0.2433 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2012
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia is 7.63 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 25.3% on the previous year and up 643.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia peaked at 7.63 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -0.2433 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2012.
That places Europe & Central Asia 26th out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.084 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -0.0219 current US$ per square kilometre | -126.1% |
| 1963 | -0.0183 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1964 | -0.0548 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0767 current US$ per square kilometre | -240.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0457 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.5% |
| 1967 | 0.0676 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0183 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.0% |
| 1969 | -0.0055 current US$ per square kilometre | -130.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0603 current US$ per square kilometre | -1200.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0639 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1972 | -0.0219 current US$ per square kilometre | -134.3% |
| 1973 | -0.0237 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.3% |
| 1974 | 0.0402 current US$ per square kilometre | -269.2% |
| 1975 | 0.0164 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.1% |
| 1976 | 0.0201 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 1977 | 0.3252 current US$ per square kilometre | +1518.2% |
| 1978 | 0.1516 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.4% |
| 1979 | 0.0292 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.7% |
| 1980 | 0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.5% |
| 1981 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1982 | 0.0018 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1983 | 0.0237 current US$ per square kilometre | +1200.0% |
| 1984 | -0.0329 current US$ per square kilometre | -238.5% |
| 1985 | -0.0365 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.1% |
| 1986 | -0.0475 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 1987 | -0.0566 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.2% |
| 1988 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1989 | -0.0274 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1990 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1991 | -0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1992 | 0.007 current US$ per square kilometre | -291.8% |
| 1993 | 0.0048 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.9% |
| 1994 | 0.1139 current US$ per square kilometre | +2285.0% |
| 1995 | 0.2472 current US$ per square kilometre | +117.1% |
| 1996 | 0.2039 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 1997 | 0.3232 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.5% |
| 1998 | 0.3954 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.3% |
| 1999 | 0.1872 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.7% |
| 2000 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +449.3% |
| 2001 | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.3% |
| 2002 | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.0% |
| 2003 | 0.7394 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.8% |
| 2004 | 1.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.5% |
| 2005 | 0.9691 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 2006 | 0.8804 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.2% |
| 2007 | 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.9% |
| 2008 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2009 | 0.9978 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.9% |
| 2010 | 0.915 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2011 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +44.8% |
| 2012 | -0.2433 current US$ per square kilometre | -118.4% |
| 2013 | 1.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -522.2% |
| 2014 | 1.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.8% |
| 2015 | 1.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 2016 | 1.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.2% |
| 2017 | 1.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +46.5% |
| 2018 | 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.2% |
| 2019 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.2% |
| 2020 | 0.7035 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.8% |
| 2021 | 1.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +99.2% |
| 2022 | 6.09 current US$ per square kilometre | +334.6% |
| 2023 | 7.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0213 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0548 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.084 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0661 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0237 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3252 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | -0.0172 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0566 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0237 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.1479 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3954 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7394 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.75 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2433 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 3.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7035 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia
- 23 Republic of Moldova 31.32 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Eswatini 29.65 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Gambia 29.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Poland 29.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Iraq 28.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Mali 26.28 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Burundi 24.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia was 7.63 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 7.63 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.2433 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- How does Europe & Central Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 26th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 643.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.