Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Middle income
Middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 7.68 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Middle income stood at 7.68 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 9.1% on the previous year and down 5.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Middle income peaked at 15.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, -0.0021 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1962.
That places Middle income 25th out of 46 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0095 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | -0.0021 current US$ per square kilometre | -121.8% |
| 1963 | -0.0017 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.7% |
| 1964 | 0.0103 current US$ per square kilometre | -700.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0298 current US$ per square kilometre | +188.3% |
| 1966 | 0.1181 current US$ per square kilometre | +297.1% |
| 1967 | 0.1316 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 1968 | 0.1647 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.2% |
| 1969 | 0.406 current US$ per square kilometre | +146.5% |
| 1970 | 0.4576 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.7% |
| 1971 | 0.4449 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.8% |
| 1972 | 0.4972 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.8% |
| 1973 | 0.8568 current US$ per square kilometre | +72.3% |
| 1974 | 1.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.9% |
| 1975 | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.1% |
| 1976 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1977 | 1.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.7% |
| 1978 | 2.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.4% |
| 1979 | 3.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 1980 | 2.88 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1981 | 2.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.1% |
| 1982 | 2.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.9% |
| 1983 | 2.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.2% |
| 1984 | 2.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 1985 | 3.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1986 | 4.93 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.8% |
| 1987 | 5.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.4% |
| 1988 | 5.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 1989 | 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1990 | 6.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.5% |
| 1991 | 6.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.7% |
| 1992 | 5.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.1% |
| 1993 | 5.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1994 | 6.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.4% |
| 1995 | 6.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.2% |
| 1996 | 9.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.9% |
| 1997 | 8.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.1% |
| 1998 | 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 1999 | 8.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.7% |
| 2000 | 8.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 2001 | 8.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.8% |
| 2002 | 9.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2003 | 7.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.0% |
| 2004 | 10.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.6% |
| 2005 | 11.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.0% |
| 2006 | 13.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.2% |
| 2007 | 13.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 2008 | 15.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.2% |
| 2009 | 13.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.1% |
| 2010 | 15.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.0% |
| 2011 | 13.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.9% |
| 2012 | 10.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.6% |
| 2013 | 8.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 2014 | 8.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2015 | 5.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.6% |
| 2016 | 5.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.0% |
| 2017 | 5.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2018 | 5.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2019 | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.8% |
| 2020 | 4.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.9% |
| 2021 | 5.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.1% |
| 2022 | 7.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +39.9% |
| 2023 | 7.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0962 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0021 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.406 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4449 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 11.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 6.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle income
- 22 Cuba 33.06 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Republic of Moldova 31.32 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Eswatini 29.65 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Gambia 29.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Poland 29.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Iraq 28.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Mali 26.28 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 373.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 293.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.42 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 6.29 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.17 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.38 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 463.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 10.26 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Middle income was 7.68 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 15.23 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0021 current US$ per square kilometre in 1962.
- How does Middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Middle income ranks 25th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in Middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 5.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.