Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Pakistan
Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
4.95 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 59.4%
World rank
66th
of 134 countries
All-time high
38.86 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2010
All-time low
-10.25 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2003
Years of data
58
1965–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Pakistan, 1965–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Pakistan stood at 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 59.4% on the previous year and down 58.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Pakistan peaked at 38.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, -10.25 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2003.
Pakistan ranks 66th of 134 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1965 | 0.1038 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1966 | 0.0908 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1967 | 0.3243 current US$ per square kilometre | +257.1% |
| 1968 | 0.5059 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.0% |
| 1969 | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +164.1% |
| 1970 | 1.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 1971 | 2.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.0% |
| 1972 | 1.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.7% |
| 1973 | 3.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +264.2% |
| 1974 | 1.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.4% |
| 1975 | 1.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.9% |
| 1976 | 0.4411 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.2% |
| 1977 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +435.3% |
| 1978 | 3.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.2% |
| 1979 | 32.55 current US$ per square kilometre | +771.2% |
| 1980 | 3.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.4% |
| 1981 | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.7% |
| 1982 | 1.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.6% |
| 1983 | 0.1427 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.6% |
| 1985 | -0.3243 current US$ per square kilometre | -327.3% |
| 1986 | -0.3373 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 1987 | -0.3243 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 1988 | -0.3632 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.0% |
| 1989 | -1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +235.7% |
| 1990 | -1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.9% |
| 1991 | 0.3243 current US$ per square kilometre | -131.2% |
| 1992 | -2.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -772.0% |
| 1993 | -1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.7% |
| 1994 | -0.7524 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.7% |
| 1995 | 4.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -670.7% |
| 1996 | 4.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.4% |
| 1997 | -3.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -182.0% |
| 1998 | -0.2205 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.6% |
| 1999 | -1.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +782.4% |
| 2000 | -0.1816 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.7% |
| 2001 | -0.9859 current US$ per square kilometre | +442.9% |
| 2002 | -1.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.6% |
| 2003 | -10.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +563.9% |
| 2004 | -0.5837 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.3% |
| 2005 | 5.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -1035.6% |
| 2006 | -5.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -207.4% |
| 2007 | -0.5708 current US$ per square kilometre | -90.3% |
| 2008 | 0.013 current US$ per square kilometre | -102.3% |
| 2009 | 6.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +47499.9% |
| 2010 | 38.86 current US$ per square kilometre | +529.4% |
| 2011 | 23.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.5% |
| 2012 | 19.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.1% |
| 2013 | 11.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.3% |
| 2014 | 21.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +85.7% |
| 2015 | 20.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 2016 | 6.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.7% |
| 2017 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.0% |
| 2018 | 0.3213 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.7% |
| 2019 | 0.3865 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 2020 | 5.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +1275.4% |
| 2021 | 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.2% |
| 2022 | 12.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.8% |
| 2023 | 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4722 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0908 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1970s | 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.4411 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.8317 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1990s | -0.2102 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | -0.8328 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 14.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3213 current US$ per square kilometre | 38.86 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 7.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
- 63 Benin 5.36 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 64 Honduras 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 65 Morocco 5.2 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 67 Guinea-Bissau 4.75 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 68 Lesotho 3.95 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 69 Nigeria 3.34 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Pakistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 7.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 28,763 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 31.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany -14.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 19.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 84.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 13.81 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -138.02 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Pakistan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Pakistan was 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 38.86 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -10.25 current US$ per square kilometre in 2003.
- How does Pakistan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Pakistan ranks 66th out of 134 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 58.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 58 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.