Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Serbia
Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 23.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Serbia, 2006–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Serbia recorded 23.33 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 30,940.2% on the previous year and up 76.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Serbia peaked at 38.87 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007 and was at its lowest, -366.99 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2012.
Serbia ranks 30th of 134 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Serbia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 9.72 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2007 | 38.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 2008 | 10.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.2% |
| 2009 | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.9% |
| 2010 | 4.23 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.4% |
| 2011 | 25.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +505.4% |
| 2012 | -366.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -1532.9% |
| 2013 | 13.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -103.6% |
| 2014 | 23.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.5% |
| 2015 | 22.54 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.7% |
| 2016 | 9.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.9% |
| 2017 | -0.1161 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.3% |
| 2019 | 0.2509 current US$ per square kilometre | -316.1% |
| 2021 | 0.0752 current US$ per square kilometre | -70.0% |
| 2023 | 23.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +30940.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 38.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 2010s | -29.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -366.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 25.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2020s | 11.7 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0752 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 2 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
- 27 Iraq 28.71 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Mali 26.28 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Burundi 24.4 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 31 Lithuania 22.97 current US$ per square kilometre
- 32 Niger 22.56 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Bulgaria 21.98 current US$ per square kilometre
More aid effectiveness data for Serbia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 10.83 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 343,039 current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 134,406 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 454.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 27.64 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 57.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 167.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.51 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 828,015 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -11.46 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Serbia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Serbia was 23.33 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 38.87 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was -366.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 2012.
- How does Serbia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Serbia ranks 30th out of 134 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 76.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.