Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Serbia
Serbia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Serbia, 1997–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Serbia stood at 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP.
That represents a change of up 25,146.1% on the previous year and up 5.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Serbia peaked at 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2004 and was at its lowest, -0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP, in 2012.
Serbia ranks 61st of 134 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per in Serbia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1997 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1998 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +346.6% |
| 1999 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -94.7% |
| 2001 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +6424.9% |
| 2002 | 0.0004 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +617.4% |
| 2003 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -88.8% |
| 2004 | 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +1222.7% |
| 2005 | 0.0003 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -57.2% |
| 2006 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -91.0% |
| 2007 | 0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +196.7% |
| 2008 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -77.8% |
| 2009 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -60.7% |
| 2010 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +28.7% |
| 2011 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +414.3% |
| 2012 | -0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -1728.2% |
| 2013 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -103.2% |
| 2014 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +83.4% |
| 2015 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +13.3% |
| 2016 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -59.8% |
| 2017 | -0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -101.2% |
| 2019 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -284.5% |
| 2021 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -76.6% |
| 2023 | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | +25146.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 3 |
| 2000s | 0.0002 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.0001 current US$ per US$ of GDP | -0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP | 2 |
Countries ranked near Serbia
More aid effectiveness data for Serbia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 10.83 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 343,039 current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 134,406 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 454.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 27.64 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 57.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 167.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.51 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 828,015 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -11.46 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Serbia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per in Serbia was 0 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Serbia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2004.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per recorded in Serbia?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0007 current US$ per US$ of GDP in 2012.
- How does Serbia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per?
- Serbia ranks 61st out of 134 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark (current us$), per rising or falling in Serbia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 5.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Serbia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 23 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.