Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) in Africa Eastern and Southern
Africa Eastern and Southern: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) was 306.10 million current US$ in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark in Africa Eastern and Southern, 1970–2019
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2019, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark in Africa Eastern and Southern stood at 306.10 million current US$.
The figure is up 31.1% on the previous year and down 45.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark in Africa Eastern and Southern peaked at 579.98 million current US$ in 2011 and was at its lowest, 12.49 million current US$, in 1970.
That places Africa Eastern and Southern 14th out of 46 groups with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$) in Africa Eastern and Southern, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 12.49 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 13.46 million current US$ | +7.8% |
| 1972 | 20.23 million current US$ | +50.3% |
| 1973 | 23.41 million current US$ | +15.7% |
| 1974 | 35.65 million current US$ | +52.3% |
| 1975 | 46.09 million current US$ | +29.3% |
| 1976 | 48.98 million current US$ | +6.3% |
| 1977 | 71.52 million current US$ | +46.0% |
| 1978 | 72.23 million current US$ | +1.0% |
| 1979 | 90.92 million current US$ | +25.9% |
| 1980 | 105.85 million current US$ | +16.4% |
| 1981 | 85.18 million current US$ | -19.5% |
| 1982 | 91.38 million current US$ | +7.3% |
| 1983 | 105.24 million current US$ | +15.2% |
| 1984 | 85.61 million current US$ | -18.7% |
| 1985 | 95.60 million current US$ | +11.7% |
| 1986 | 140.71 million current US$ | +47.2% |
| 1987 | 174.79 million current US$ | +24.2% |
| 1988 | 208.86 million current US$ | +19.5% |
| 1989 | 223.58 million current US$ | +7.0% |
| 1990 | 241.80 million current US$ | +8.1% |
| 1991 | 239.54 million current US$ | -0.9% |
| 1992 | 252.34 million current US$ | +5.3% |
| 1993 | 256.32 million current US$ | +1.6% |
| 1994 | 267.99 million current US$ | +4.6% |
| 1995 | 279.17 million current US$ | +4.2% |
| 1996 | 336.19 million current US$ | +20.4% |
| 1997 | 286.75 million current US$ | -14.7% |
| 1998 | 327.07 million current US$ | +14.1% |
| 1999 | 331.84 million current US$ | +1.5% |
| 2000 | 304.49 million current US$ | -8.2% |
| 2001 | 295.06 million current US$ | -3.1% |
| 2002 | 258.34 million current US$ | -12.4% |
| 2003 | 297.58 million current US$ | +15.2% |
| 2004 | 341.58 million current US$ | +14.8% |
| 2005 | 375.27 million current US$ | +9.9% |
| 2006 | 440.58 million current US$ | +17.4% |
| 2007 | 503.82 million current US$ | +14.4% |
| 2008 | 516.92 million current US$ | +2.6% |
| 2009 | 559.11 million current US$ | +8.2% |
| 2010 | 511.50 million current US$ | -8.5% |
| 2011 | 579.98 million current US$ | +13.4% |
| 2012 | 473.35 million current US$ | -18.4% |
| 2013 | 421.30 million current US$ | -11.0% |
| 2014 | 403.41 million current US$ | -4.2% |
| 2015 | 256.97 million current US$ | -36.3% |
| 2016 | 270.37 million current US$ | +5.2% |
| 2017 | 264.76 million current US$ | -2.1% |
| 2018 | 233.48 million current US$ | -11.8% |
| 2019 | 306.10 million current US$ | +31.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 43.50 million current US$ | 12.49 million current US$ | 90.92 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 131.68 million current US$ | 85.18 million current US$ | 223.58 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 281.90 million current US$ | 239.54 million current US$ | 336.19 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 389.27 million current US$ | 258.34 million current US$ | 559.11 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 372.12 million current US$ | 233.48 million current US$ | 579.98 million current US$ | 10 |
Countries ranked near Africa Eastern and Southern
- 11 Niger 28.58 million current US$ compare
- 12 Yemen 25.35 million current US$ compare
- 13 Bangladesh 21.20 million current US$ compare
- 14 Kosovo 19.06 million current US$ compare
- 14 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 19.06 million current US$ compare
- 16 Lebanon 18.94 million current US$ compare
- 17 Sudan 14.88 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Africa Eastern and Southern
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 40.98 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 274.72 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 439.63 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 1.83 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 221.30 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.43 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 354.94 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.34 billion current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 162.46 million current US$ (2019)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 885.14 million current US$ (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark in Africa Eastern and Southern?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark in Africa Eastern and Southern was 306.10 million current US$ in 2019, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark recorded in Africa Eastern and Southern?
- The highest recorded value was 579.98 million current US$ in 2011.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark recorded in Africa Eastern and Southern?
- The lowest recorded value was 12.49 million current US$ in 1970.
- How does Africa Eastern and Southern rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark?
- Africa Eastern and Southern ranks 14th out of 46 groups with data for 2019.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark rising or falling in Africa Eastern and Southern?
- Over the last ten years it is down 45.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Africa Eastern and Southern data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.