Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark in China
China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark was 425,495 current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark in China, 1980–2023
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark in China is 425,495 current US$, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 62.4% on the previous year and up 107.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark in China peaked at 23.19 million current US$ in 1987 and was at its lowest, -18.52 million current US$, in 2003.
China ranks 77th of 136 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark in China, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 20,000 current US$ | — |
| 1981 | 60,000 current US$ | +200.0% |
| 1982 | 8.49 million current US$ | +14050.0% |
| 1983 | 5.19 million current US$ | -38.9% |
| 1984 | 2.17 million current US$ | -58.2% |
| 1985 | 8.32 million current US$ | +283.4% |
| 1986 | 19.22 million current US$ | +131.0% |
| 1987 | 23.19 million current US$ | +20.7% |
| 1988 | 19.48 million current US$ | -16.0% |
| 1989 | 10.99 million current US$ | -43.6% |
| 1990 | 10.97 million current US$ | -0.2% |
| 1991 | 6.78 million current US$ | -38.2% |
| 1992 | 14.82 million current US$ | +118.6% |
| 1993 | 3.72 million current US$ | -74.9% |
| 1994 | -310,000 current US$ | -108.3% |
| 1995 | 10.07 million current US$ | -3348.4% |
| 1996 | 20.92 million current US$ | +107.7% |
| 1997 | 13.72 million current US$ | -34.4% |
| 1998 | -3.85 million current US$ | -128.1% |
| 1999 | 60,000 current US$ | -101.6% |
| 2000 | -1.71 million current US$ | -2950.0% |
| 2001 | 10.23 million current US$ | -698.2% |
| 2002 | 6.31 million current US$ | -38.3% |
| 2003 | -18.52 million current US$ | -393.5% |
| 2004 | 16.16 million current US$ | -187.3% |
| 2005 | 4.76 million current US$ | -70.5% |
| 2006 | 5.48 million current US$ | +15.1% |
| 2007 | -2.55 million current US$ | -146.5% |
| 2008 | 350,000 current US$ | -113.7% |
| 2009 | 14.73 million current US$ | +4108.6% |
| 2010 | 750,000 current US$ | -94.9% |
| 2011 | 12.08 million current US$ | +1510.7% |
| 2012 | 5.65 million current US$ | -53.2% |
| 2013 | -5.72 million current US$ | -201.2% |
| 2014 | -9.44 million current US$ | +65.1% |
| 2015 | 418,909 current US$ | -104.4% |
| 2016 | 3.28 million current US$ | +682.2% |
| 2017 | -9.10 million current US$ | -377.6% |
| 2018 | 2.86 million current US$ | -131.4% |
| 2019 | 685,170 current US$ | -76.0% |
| 2020 | -1.00 million current US$ | -246.0% |
| 2021 | 414,524 current US$ | -141.4% |
| 2022 | 1.13 million current US$ | +173.3% |
| 2023 | 425,495 current US$ | -62.4% |
China compared with similar countries
- China's 425,495 current US$ is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 167,520 current US$, 2.5× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- China's 425,495 current US$ is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 84,569 current US$, 5.0× the median. (19 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark in China changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1982 | +14050.0% | 60,000 current US$ | 8.49 million current US$ |
| 2009 | +4108.6% | 350,000 current US$ | 14.73 million current US$ |
| 1995 | +3348.4% | -310,000 current US$ | 10.07 million current US$ |
| 2000 | -2950.0% | 60,000 current US$ | -1.71 million current US$ |
| 2011 | +1510.7% | 750,000 current US$ | 12.08 million current US$ |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 9.71 million current US$ | 20,000 current US$ | 23.19 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 7.69 million current US$ | -3.85 million current US$ | 20.92 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.52 million current US$ | -18.52 million current US$ | 16.16 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 147,192 current US$ | -9.44 million current US$ | 12.08 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 243,202 current US$ | -1.00 million current US$ | 1.13 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near China
More aid effectiveness data for China
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 8.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 100,022 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada -11.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 216.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -48.60 million current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -8.89 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -521.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark in China?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark in China was 425,495 current US$ in 2023, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 23.19 million current US$ in 1987.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was -18.52 million current US$ in 2003.
- How does China rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark?
- China ranks 77th out of 136 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 107.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.