Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark in IBRD only
IBRD only: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark was 266.14 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark in IBRD only, 1970–2022
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark in IBRD only is 266.14 million current US$, measured in 2022.
The figure is up 138.8% on the previous year and up 104.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark in IBRD only peaked at 291.39 million current US$ in 2008 and was at its lowest, 10.94 million current US$, in 1972.
IBRD only ranks 16th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark in IBRD only, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 17.22 million current US$ | — |
| 1971 | 11.85 million current US$ | -31.2% |
| 1972 | 10.94 million current US$ | -7.7% |
| 1973 | 18.93 million current US$ | +73.0% |
| 1974 | 23.28 million current US$ | +23.0% |
| 1975 | 33.25 million current US$ | +42.8% |
| 1976 | 41.49 million current US$ | +24.8% |
| 1977 | 45.78 million current US$ | +10.3% |
| 1978 | 73.95 million current US$ | +61.5% |
| 1979 | 67.28 million current US$ | -9.0% |
| 1980 | 58.95 million current US$ | -12.4% |
| 1981 | 54.30 million current US$ | -7.9% |
| 1982 | 55.53 million current US$ | +2.3% |
| 1983 | 64.57 million current US$ | +16.3% |
| 1984 | 43.38 million current US$ | -32.8% |
| 1985 | 48.66 million current US$ | +12.2% |
| 1986 | 103.58 million current US$ | +112.9% |
| 1987 | 148.32 million current US$ | +43.2% |
| 1988 | 80.34 million current US$ | -45.8% |
| 1989 | 97.39 million current US$ | +21.2% |
| 1990 | 116.93 million current US$ | +20.1% |
| 1991 | 117.37 million current US$ | +0.4% |
| 1992 | 141.01 million current US$ | +20.1% |
| 1993 | 108.23 million current US$ | -23.2% |
| 1994 | 145.89 million current US$ | +34.8% |
| 1995 | 175.69 million current US$ | +20.4% |
| 1996 | 263.24 million current US$ | +49.8% |
| 1997 | 283.98 million current US$ | +7.9% |
| 1998 | 266.28 million current US$ | -6.2% |
| 1999 | 264.63 million current US$ | -0.6% |
| 2000 | 254.76 million current US$ | -3.7% |
| 2001 | 268.61 million current US$ | +5.4% |
| 2002 | 241.74 million current US$ | -10.0% |
| 2003 | 187.06 million current US$ | -22.6% |
| 2004 | 244.08 million current US$ | +30.5% |
| 2005 | 246.36 million current US$ | +0.9% |
| 2006 | 228.32 million current US$ | -7.3% |
| 2007 | 226.48 million current US$ | -0.8% |
| 2008 | 291.39 million current US$ | +28.7% |
| 2009 | 223.19 million current US$ | -23.4% |
| 2010 | 251.66 million current US$ | +12.8% |
| 2011 | 215.16 million current US$ | -14.5% |
| 2012 | 130.24 million current US$ | -39.5% |
| 2013 | 111.29 million current US$ | -14.6% |
| 2014 | 120.25 million current US$ | +8.1% |
| 2015 | 107.53 million current US$ | -10.6% |
| 2016 | 106.22 million current US$ | -1.2% |
| 2017 | 144.25 million current US$ | +35.8% |
| 2018 | 136.64 million current US$ | -5.3% |
| 2019 | 75.14 million current US$ | -45.0% |
| 2020 | 73.68 million current US$ | -1.9% |
| 2021 | 111.43 million current US$ | +51.2% |
| 2022 | 266.14 million current US$ | +138.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 34.40 million current US$ | 10.94 million current US$ | 73.95 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 75.50 million current US$ | 43.38 million current US$ | 148.32 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 188.32 million current US$ | 108.23 million current US$ | 283.98 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 241.20 million current US$ | 187.06 million current US$ | 291.39 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 139.84 million current US$ | 75.14 million current US$ | 251.66 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 150.42 million current US$ | 73.68 million current US$ | 266.14 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near IBRD only
- 13 Bangladesh 21.20 million current US$ compare
- 14 Kosovo 19.06 million current US$ compare
- 14 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 19.06 million current US$ compare
- 16 Lebanon 18.94 million current US$ compare
- 17 Sudan 14.88 million current US$ compare
- 18 Tanzania 14.45 million current US$ compare
- 19 Rwanda 14.03 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for IBRD only
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 312.16 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 136.55 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.62 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 14.43 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 676.02 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 7.05 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.49 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 887.01 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 783.59 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 5.79 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark in IBRD only?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark in IBRD only was 266.14 million current US$ in 2022, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark recorded in IBRD only?
- The highest recorded value was 291.39 million current US$ in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark recorded in IBRD only?
- The lowest recorded value was 10.94 million current US$ in 1972.
- How does IBRD only rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark?
- IBRD only ranks 16th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, denmark rising or falling in IBRD only?
- Over the last ten years it is up 104.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this IBRD only data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Denmark (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.