Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Jordan
Jordan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 12.94 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Jordan, 1972–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Jordan stood at 12.94 % change on previous year.
The figure is up 118.1% on the previous year and down 78.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Jordan peaked at 477.06 % change on previous year in 2000 and was at its lowest, -78.96 % change on previous year, in 1992.
Jordan ranks 81st of 169 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Jordan, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | -67.14 % change on previous year | — |
| 1973 | 270 % change on previous year | -502.2% |
| 1974 | 106.18 % change on previous year | -60.7% |
| 1975 | -42.32 % change on previous year | -139.9% |
| 1976 | 12.34 % change on previous year | -129.2% |
| 1977 | -32.95 % change on previous year | -367.1% |
| 1978 | 209.91 % change on previous year | -737.1% |
| 1979 | -7.79 % change on previous year | -103.7% |
| 1980 | 68.78 % change on previous year | -983.1% |
| 1981 | -63.54 % change on previous year | -192.4% |
| 1982 | 80.15 % change on previous year | -226.1% |
| 1983 | -17.41 % change on previous year | -121.7% |
| 1984 | -39.87 % change on previous year | +128.9% |
| 1985 | 48.77 % change on previous year | -222.3% |
| 1986 | 2.76 % change on previous year | -94.3% |
| 1987 | -44.09 % change on previous year | -1695.9% |
| 1988 | 16.03 % change on previous year | -136.4% |
| 1989 | 16.85 % change on previous year | +5.1% |
| 1990 | 56.03 % change on previous year | +232.5% |
| 1992 | -78.96 % change on previous year | -240.9% |
| 1993 | 0.615 % change on previous year | -100.8% |
| 1994 | 27.11 % change on previous year | +4308.9% |
| 1995 | 6.44 % change on previous year | -76.2% |
| 1996 | 104.97 % change on previous year | +1529.1% |
| 1997 | -23.35 % change on previous year | -122.2% |
| 1998 | -43.34 % change on previous year | +85.6% |
| 1999 | -71.68 % change on previous year | +65.4% |
| 2000 | 477.06 % change on previous year | -765.5% |
| 2001 | -44.56 % change on previous year | -109.3% |
| 2002 | 36.81 % change on previous year | -182.6% |
| 2003 | -29.15 % change on previous year | -179.2% |
| 2004 | 25.06 % change on previous year | -186.0% |
| 2005 | -31.24 % change on previous year | -224.7% |
| 2006 | 35.03 % change on previous year | -212.1% |
| 2007 | 34.04 % change on previous year | -2.8% |
| 2008 | 58.31 % change on previous year | +71.3% |
| 2009 | -19.84 % change on previous year | -134.0% |
| 2010 | 52.01 % change on previous year | -362.1% |
| 2011 | 1.03 % change on previous year | -98.0% |
| 2012 | -5.58 % change on previous year | -640.7% |
| 2013 | 60.82 % change on previous year | -1190.3% |
| 2014 | -0.3142 % change on previous year | -100.5% |
| 2015 | 0.1047 % change on previous year | -133.3% |
| 2016 | 23.91 % change on previous year | +22732.8% |
| 2017 | -13.77 % change on previous year | -157.6% |
| 2018 | -23.75 % change on previous year | +72.5% |
| 2019 | -0.6186 % change on previous year | -97.4% |
| 2020 | 190.99 % change on previous year | -30976.5% |
| 2021 | 42.69 % change on previous year | -77.6% |
| 2022 | -71.36 % change on previous year | -267.2% |
| 2023 | 12.94 % change on previous year | -118.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 56.03 % change on previous year | -67.14 % change on previous year | 270 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1980s | 6.84 % change on previous year | -63.54 % change on previous year | 80.15 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -2.46 % change on previous year | -78.96 % change on previous year | 104.97 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2000s | 54.15 % change on previous year | -44.56 % change on previous year | 477.06 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 9.38 % change on previous year | -23.75 % change on previous year | 60.82 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 43.81 % change on previous year | -71.36 % change on previous year | 190.99 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Jordan
- 78 Republic of Moldova 13.59 % change on previous year compare
- 79 Somalia 13.58 % change on previous year compare
- 80 Djibouti 13.06 % change on previous year compare
- 82 Guatemala 12.15 % change on previous year compare
- 83 Côte d'Ivoire 12.02 % change on previous year compare
- 84 Cameroon 11.12 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Jordan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 4.83 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 17,842 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 123.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 216.17 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 16.13 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 395.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 33.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 34.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 33.72 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 91.09 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Jordan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Jordan was 12.94 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Jordan?
- The highest recorded value was 477.06 % change on previous year in 2000.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Jordan?
- The lowest recorded value was -78.96 % change on previous year in 1992.
- How does Jordan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Jordan ranks 81st out of 169 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Jordan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 78.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Jordan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 51 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.