Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Bangladesh
Bangladesh: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 1.14 current US$ per person in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Bangladesh, 1971–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per person.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Bangladesh stood at 1.14 current US$ per person.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 26.7% on the previous year and up 49.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Bangladesh peaked at 1.68 current US$ per person in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.068 current US$ per person, in 1985.
Bangladesh ranks 128th of 172 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Bangladesh, year by year
| Year | current US$ per person | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 0.0852 current US$ per person | — |
| 1972 | 0.1082 current US$ per person | +26.9% |
| 1973 | 0.4762 current US$ per person | +340.2% |
| 1974 | 0.5302 current US$ per person | +11.3% |
| 1975 | 0.7798 current US$ per person | +47.1% |
| 1976 | 0.1901 current US$ per person | -75.6% |
| 1977 | 0.5394 current US$ per person | +183.8% |
| 1978 | 0.3551 current US$ per person | -34.2% |
| 1979 | 0.2593 current US$ per person | -27.0% |
| 1980 | 0.3773 current US$ per person | +45.5% |
| 1981 | 0.5952 current US$ per person | +57.8% |
| 1982 | 0.7273 current US$ per person | +22.2% |
| 1983 | 0.4274 current US$ per person | -41.2% |
| 1984 | 0.5053 current US$ per person | +18.2% |
| 1985 | 0.068 current US$ per person | -86.5% |
| 1986 | 0.1959 current US$ per person | +188.0% |
| 1987 | 0.3786 current US$ per person | +93.2% |
| 1988 | 0.5043 current US$ per person | +33.2% |
| 1989 | 0.9635 current US$ per person | +91.1% |
| 1990 | 0.5258 current US$ per person | -45.4% |
| 1991 | 0.5172 current US$ per person | -1.6% |
| 1992 | 0.4428 current US$ per person | -14.4% |
| 1993 | 0.596 current US$ per person | +34.6% |
| 1994 | 0.4676 current US$ per person | -21.6% |
| 1995 | 0.9109 current US$ per person | +94.8% |
| 1996 | 0.904 current US$ per person | -0.8% |
| 1997 | 0.6377 current US$ per person | -29.5% |
| 1998 | 0.6736 current US$ per person | +5.6% |
| 1999 | 0.4853 current US$ per person | -28.0% |
| 2000 | 0.5083 current US$ per person | +4.7% |
| 2001 | 0.5404 current US$ per person | +6.3% |
| 2002 | 0.1781 current US$ per person | -67.0% |
| 2003 | 0.3712 current US$ per person | +108.5% |
| 2004 | 0.4072 current US$ per person | +9.7% |
| 2005 | 0.5411 current US$ per person | +32.9% |
| 2006 | 0.689 current US$ per person | +27.3% |
| 2007 | 0.6855 current US$ per person | -0.5% |
| 2008 | 1.3 current US$ per person | +89.8% |
| 2009 | 0.874 current US$ per person | -32.8% |
| 2010 | 1.24 current US$ per person | +41.8% |
| 2011 | 1.04 current US$ per person | -16.4% |
| 2012 | 0.8268 current US$ per person | -20.2% |
| 2013 | 0.7664 current US$ per person | -7.3% |
| 2014 | 0.6218 current US$ per person | -18.9% |
| 2015 | 0.4985 current US$ per person | -19.8% |
| 2016 | 0.7158 current US$ per person | +43.6% |
| 2017 | 0.8721 current US$ per person | +21.8% |
| 2018 | 1.03 current US$ per person | +18.2% |
| 2019 | 0.9745 current US$ per person | -5.5% |
| 2020 | 1.68 current US$ per person | +72.5% |
| 2021 | 1.4 current US$ per person | -16.8% |
| 2022 | 0.9033 current US$ per person | -35.4% |
| 2023 | 1.14 current US$ per person | +26.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.3693 current US$ per person | 0.0852 current US$ per person | 0.7798 current US$ per person | 9 |
| 1980s | 0.4743 current US$ per person | 0.068 current US$ per person | 0.9635 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.6161 current US$ per person | 0.4428 current US$ per person | 0.9109 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.6096 current US$ per person | 0.1781 current US$ per person | 1.3 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.8583 current US$ per person | 0.4985 current US$ per person | 1.24 current US$ per person | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.28 current US$ per person | 0.9033 current US$ per person | 1.68 current US$ per person | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bangladesh
- 125 Sri Lanka 1.29 current US$ per person compare
- 126 South Africa 1.28 current US$ per person compare
- 127 Ghana 1.27 current US$ per person compare
- 129 Russian Federation 1.11 current US$ per person compare
- 130 Jamaica 1.05 current US$ per person compare
- 131 Angola 0.9398 current US$ per person compare
More aid effectiveness data for Bangladesh
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 2.76 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.04 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 75.38 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 196.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 37.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 176.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 155.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 71.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.85 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Bangladesh?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Bangladesh was 1.14 current US$ per person in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Bangladesh?
- The highest recorded value was 1.68 current US$ per person in 2020.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Bangladesh?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.068 current US$ per person in 1985.
- How does Bangladesh rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Bangladesh ranks 128th out of 172 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Bangladesh?
- Over the last ten years it is up 49.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bangladesh data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 53 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Population, total
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Population, total World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.