Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Europe & Central Asia
Europe & Central Asia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 849.35 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Europe & Central Asia, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Europe & Central Asia stood at 849.35 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
That represents a change of up 89.7% on the previous year and up 388.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Europe & Central Asia peaked at 849.35 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -3.99 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1990.
That places Europe & Central Asia 2nd out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Europe & Central Asia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0.0073 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.0164 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0694 current US$ per square kilometre | +322.2% |
| 1966 | 1.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +2018.4% |
| 1967 | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +220.2% |
| 1968 | 4.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.1% |
| 1969 | 0.8439 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.1% |
| 1970 | 0.8987 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.5% |
| 1971 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.3% |
| 1972 | 0.811 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 1973 | 0.2229 current US$ per square kilometre | -72.5% |
| 1974 | 0.5042 current US$ per square kilometre | +126.2% |
| 1975 | 0.4695 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 1976 | 12.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +2614.0% |
| 1977 | 6.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.4% |
| 1978 | 1.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.4% |
| 1979 | 19.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +958.9% |
| 1980 | -0.3106 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.6% |
| 1981 | 4.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -1480.6% |
| 1982 | 2.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.9% |
| 1983 | 5.29 current US$ per square kilometre | +161.9% |
| 1984 | 3.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.6% |
| 1985 | 1.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.5% |
| 1986 | 14.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +960.9% |
| 1987 | 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.9% |
| 1988 | 0.6376 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.5% |
| 1989 | -2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -458.2% |
| 1990 | -3.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.8% |
| 1991 | 40.11 current US$ per square kilometre | -1104.6% |
| 1992 | 10.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.0% |
| 1993 | 23.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +123.8% |
| 1994 | 23.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1995 | 13.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.8% |
| 1996 | 22.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.5% |
| 1997 | 22.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1998 | 21.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.4% |
| 1999 | 33.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.4% |
| 2000 | 46.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +37.3% |
| 2001 | 48.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 2002 | 39.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -18.2% |
| 2003 | 31.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.2% |
| 2004 | 39.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.3% |
| 2005 | 43.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.3% |
| 2006 | 53.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.0% |
| 2007 | 53.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.7% |
| 2008 | 64.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.9% |
| 2009 | 86.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.6% |
| 2010 | 67.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.5% |
| 2011 | 202.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +198.7% |
| 2012 | 194.67 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.9% |
| 2013 | 173.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.7% |
| 2014 | 177.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 2015 | 124.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.9% |
| 2016 | 166.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.7% |
| 2017 | 127.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.7% |
| 2018 | 94.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.1% |
| 2019 | 69.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.5% |
| 2020 | 144.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +109.4% |
| 2021 | 167.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.5% |
| 2022 | 447.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +167.8% |
| 2023 | 849.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 4.46 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2229 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 3.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 20.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.99 current US$ per square kilometre | 40.11 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 50.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 86.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 139.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 67.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 202.49 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 402.27 current US$ per square kilometre | 144.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 849.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia
- 1 Palestine, State of 55,056 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 2 Saint Kitts and Nevis 53,046 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 3 Ukraine 35,428 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 4 Malta 34,125 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 5 Barbados 28,721 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Europe & Central Asia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Europe & Central Asia was 849.35 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The highest recorded value was 849.35 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Europe & Central Asia?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.99 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- How does Europe & Central Asia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Europe & Central Asia ranks 2nd out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 388.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.