Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Korea
Korea: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Korea, 1977–1999
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 1999, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Korea stood at 0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the lowest value across all 11 years on record.
That represents a change of down 50.0% on the previous year and down 90.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Korea peaked at 5.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996 and was at its lowest, 0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1999.
Korea ranks 160th of 170 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Korea, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1977 | 0.311 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +666.7% |
| 1979 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1985 | 5.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +113.0% |
| 1990 | 1.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -79.6% |
| 1991 | 0.2073 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 1995 | 0.7257 current US$ per square kilometre | +250.0% |
| 1996 | 5.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +714.3% |
| 1997 | 0.8294 current US$ per square kilometre | -86.0% |
| 1998 | 0.2073 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1999 | 0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 1.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.311 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1980s | 5.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.08 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
| 1990s | 1.29 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
Countries ranked near Korea
- 157 Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 3.76 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 158 Kazakhstan 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 159 Turkmenistan 0.2761 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 161 Saudi Arabia 0.0047 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 162 New Caledonia -20.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 163 Mexico -38.77 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Korea
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 1.74 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 10,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 770,000 current US$ (1998)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 10,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 50,000 current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.76 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 9.74 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 240,000 current US$ (1995)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.65 million current US$ (1999)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -49.52 million current US$ (1999)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Korea?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Korea was 0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Korea?
- The highest recorded value was 5.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 1996.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Korea?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1037 current US$ per square kilometre in 1999.
- How does Korea rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Korea ranks 160th out of 170 countries with data for 1999.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Korea?
- Over the last ten years it is down 90.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Korea data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.