Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Lower middle income
Lower middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 178.83 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
178.83 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 15.9%
Rank
26th
of 45 groups
All-time high
341.73 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2021
All-time low
0.2115 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Lower middle income, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Lower middle income is 178.83 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 15.9% on the previous year and down 19.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Lower middle income peaked at 341.73 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0.2115 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1961.
Lower middle income ranks 26th of 45 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Lower middle income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.2115 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 1.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +498.2% |
| 1963 | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.7% |
| 1964 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.3% |
| 1965 | 2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.9% |
| 1966 | 2.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 1967 | 2.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 1968 | 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +58.3% |
| 1969 | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.7% |
| 1970 | 3.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.9% |
| 1971 | 5.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.9% |
| 1972 | 4.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.6% |
| 1973 | 6.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.9% |
| 1974 | 12.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +79.8% |
| 1975 | 19.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.6% |
| 1976 | 10.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.7% |
| 1977 | 13.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 1978 | 22.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.5% |
| 1979 | 27.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.9% |
| 1980 | 24.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1981 | 39.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.2% |
| 1982 | 31.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1983 | 26.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 1984 | 30.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.7% |
| 1985 | 23.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.3% |
| 1986 | 30.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +32.5% |
| 1987 | 39.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.7% |
| 1988 | 60.61 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.3% |
| 1989 | 61.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1990 | 61.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 1991 | 86.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.7% |
| 1992 | 86.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1993 | 80.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.3% |
| 1994 | 94.36 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.6% |
| 1995 | 91.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.4% |
| 1996 | 113.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +24.6% |
| 1997 | 98.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 1998 | 96.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 1999 | 87.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.3% |
| 2000 | 66.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.1% |
| 2001 | 93.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.2% |
| 2002 | 86.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 2003 | 98.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2004 | 126.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.3% |
| 2005 | 134.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.4% |
| 2006 | 166.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.4% |
| 2007 | 185.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +11.4% |
| 2008 | 216.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.0% |
| 2009 | 197.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -9.0% |
| 2010 | 196.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2011 | 215.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2012 | 256.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.7% |
| 2013 | 222.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.2% |
| 2014 | 235.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.0% |
| 2015 | 210.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 2016 | 249.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.4% |
| 2017 | 241.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 2018 | 237.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 2019 | 216.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.9% |
| 2020 | 323.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.3% |
| 2021 | 341.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 2022 | 212.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.8% |
| 2023 | 178.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2115 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 12.55 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 36.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.23 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 89.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 113.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 137.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 66.95 current US$ per square kilometre | 216.54 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 228.28 current US$ per square kilometre | 196.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 256.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 264.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 178.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 341.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Lower middle income
- 23 Bosnia and Herzegovina 4,990 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Georgia 4,231 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Comoros 3,910 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 26 Poland 3,594 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 27 Slovakia 3,501 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 28 Lithuania 3,476 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Bulgaria 3,261 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Lower middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 83.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 179.59 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.02 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.38 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 654.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.26 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.64 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 725.82 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 268.87 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 8.40 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Lower middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Lower middle income was 178.83 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Lower middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 341.73 current US$ per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Lower middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.2115 current US$ per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Lower middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Lower middle income ranks 26th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Lower middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 19.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lower middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.