Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Panama
Panama: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was -68.74 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Panama, 1976–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Panama stood at -68.74 current US$ per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 600.7% on the previous year and up 51.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Panama peaked at 251.04 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018 and was at its lowest, -2,712 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2014.
Panama ranks 165th of 170 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Panama, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1976 | 5.65 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1978 | 3.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.7% |
| 1979 | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.3% |
| 1986 | 0.5381 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.6% |
| 1987 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1988 | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +337.5% |
| 1989 | 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre | -77.1% |
| 1990 | 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +275.0% |
| 1991 | 4.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.0% |
| 1992 | 16.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +281.8% |
| 1993 | 27.31 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.1% |
| 1994 | 51.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.2% |
| 1995 | 90.53 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.1% |
| 1996 | 55.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.5% |
| 1997 | 69.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.1% |
| 1998 | 51.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.3% |
| 1999 | 68.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.0% |
| 2000 | 42.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.3% |
| 2001 | 40.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.7% |
| 2002 | 19.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.7% |
| 2003 | 24.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2004 | 23.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.1% |
| 2005 | 89.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +273.6% |
| 2006 | 171.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +91.9% |
| 2007 | 39.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.8% |
| 2008 | 38.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.1% |
| 2009 | 30 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.5% |
| 2010 | 20.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.3% |
| 2011 | 183.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +802.6% |
| 2012 | 20.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.8% |
| 2013 | -142.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -794.7% |
| 2014 | -2,712 current US$ per square kilometre | +1809.6% |
| 2015 | 42.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -101.6% |
| 2016 | 114.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +170.1% |
| 2017 | 11.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.7% |
| 2018 | 251.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +2027.9% |
| 2019 | 139.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.5% |
| 2020 | -21.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -115.1% |
| 2021 | 174.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -929.6% |
| 2022 | 13.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -92.1% |
| 2023 | -68.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -600.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 3 |
| 1980s | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5381 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1990s | 44 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 90.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 51.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.37 current US$ per square kilometre | 171.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | -207.14 current US$ per square kilometre | -2,712 current US$ per square kilometre | 251.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 24.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 174.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Panama
- 162 New Caledonia -20.79 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 163 Mexico -38.77 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 164 Belarus -60.89 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 166 Egypt -100.1 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 167 Dominican Republic -181.82 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 168 Aruba -222.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Panama
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 40,042 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 7,099 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 608,378 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions -5.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland -31,719 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 816,527 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 774,820 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 277,565 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 98,832 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 194.10 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Panama?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Panama was -68.74 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Panama?
- The highest recorded value was 251.04 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Panama?
- The lowest recorded value was -2,712 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014.
- How does Panama rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Panama ranks 165th out of 170 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Panama?
- Over the last ten years it is up 51.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Panama data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 41 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.