Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Suriname
Suriname: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 61.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
61.79 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
up 292.8%
World rank
129th
of 170 countries
All-time high
166.97 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2009
All-time low
0.3115 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1963
Years of data
61
1963–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Suriname, 1963–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Suriname is 61.79 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of up 292.8% on the previous year and up 44.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Suriname peaked at 166.97 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, 0.3115 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1963.
That places Suriname 129th out of 170 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Suriname, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1963 | 0.3115 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 0.7476 current US$ per square kilometre | +140.0% |
| 1965 | 17.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +2275.0% |
| 1966 | 21.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +19.6% |
| 1967 | 23.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 1968 | 31.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.5% |
| 1969 | 15.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.7% |
| 1970 | 13.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.0% |
| 1971 | 11.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 1972 | 27.6 current US$ per square kilometre | +138.2% |
| 1973 | 29.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.4% |
| 1974 | 28.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.5% |
| 1975 | 21.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.7% |
| 1976 | 9.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.8% |
| 1977 | 13.64 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.6% |
| 1978 | 14.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +3.7% |
| 1979 | 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.5% |
| 1980 | 21.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +1200.0% |
| 1981 | 6.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.8% |
| 1982 | 10.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.2% |
| 1983 | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.7% |
| 1984 | 19.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +313.5% |
| 1985 | 6.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.6% |
| 1986 | 8.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.5% |
| 1987 | 8.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.6% |
| 1988 | 36.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +333.8% |
| 1989 | 29.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 1990 | 55.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.4% |
| 1991 | 65.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.8% |
| 1992 | 30.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.7% |
| 1993 | 13.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.6% |
| 1994 | 12.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.5% |
| 1995 | 31.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +163.9% |
| 1996 | 32.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 1997 | 32.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 1998 | 29.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1999 | 18.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.7% |
| 2000 | 13.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.2% |
| 2001 | 7.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.7% |
| 2002 | 14.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +77.2% |
| 2003 | 25.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.2% |
| 2004 | 41.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.9% |
| 2005 | 37.13 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.8% |
| 2006 | 16.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.7% |
| 2007 | 137.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +754.6% |
| 2008 | 153.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +12.1% |
| 2009 | 166.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2010 | 108.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.3% |
| 2011 | 47.1 current US$ per square kilometre | -56.4% |
| 2012 | 37.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.3% |
| 2013 | 42.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.1% |
| 2014 | 0.6022 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.6% |
| 2015 | 13.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +2098.4% |
| 2016 | 34.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +163.2% |
| 2017 | 61.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.8% |
| 2018 | 30.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2019 | 22.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.6% |
| 2020 | 33.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.2% |
| 2021 | 18.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.5% |
| 2022 | 15.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 2023 | 61.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +292.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 15.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.3115 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 1970s | 17.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 29.1 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 15.19 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 36.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 32.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 65.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 61.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 166.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 39.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.6022 current US$ per square kilometre | 108.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 32.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 15.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 61.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Suriname
- 126 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 66.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 127 South Africa 66.64 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 128 Colombia 61.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 130 Costa Rica 56.98 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 131 Mauritania 55.02 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 132 Libya 53.54 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Suriname
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 78,909 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 50,796 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 9.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 41,736 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 78,978 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -1.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 6,620 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 14.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 3.02 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Suriname?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Suriname was 61.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Suriname?
- The highest recorded value was 166.97 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Suriname?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3115 current US$ per square kilometre in 1963.
- How does Suriname rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Suriname ranks 129th out of 170 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Suriname?
- Over the last ten years it is up 44.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Suriname data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 61 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.