Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Tanzania, United Republic of
Tanzania, United Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions was 120.60 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Tanzania, United Republic of, 1972–2023
Source: Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Tanzania, United Republic of stood at 120.60 million current US$.
That represents a change of up 19.3% on the previous year and up 13.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Tanzania, United Republic of peaked at 192.60 million current US$ in 2010 and was at its lowest, 30,000 current US$, in 1972.
That places Tanzania, United Republic of 43rd out of 172 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions in Tanzania, United Republic of, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 30,000 current US$ | — |
| 1975 | 15.05 million current US$ | +50066.7% |
| 1976 | 5.70 million current US$ | -62.1% |
| 1977 | 10.64 million current US$ | +86.7% |
| 1978 | 19.93 million current US$ | +87.3% |
| 1979 | 29.20 million current US$ | +46.5% |
| 1980 | 25.13 million current US$ | -13.9% |
| 1981 | 40.58 million current US$ | +61.5% |
| 1982 | 29.95 million current US$ | -26.2% |
| 1983 | 27.14 million current US$ | -9.4% |
| 1984 | 31.94 million current US$ | +17.7% |
| 1985 | 29.93 million current US$ | -6.3% |
| 1986 | 37.40 million current US$ | +25.0% |
| 1987 | 32.94 million current US$ | -11.9% |
| 1988 | 34.73 million current US$ | +5.4% |
| 1989 | 51.52 million current US$ | +48.3% |
| 1990 | 41.90 million current US$ | -18.7% |
| 1991 | 40.69 million current US$ | -2.9% |
| 1992 | 111.50 million current US$ | +174.0% |
| 1993 | 69.45 million current US$ | -37.7% |
| 1994 | 87.28 million current US$ | +25.7% |
| 1995 | 63.78 million current US$ | -26.9% |
| 1996 | 44.33 million current US$ | -30.5% |
| 1997 | 63.90 million current US$ | +44.1% |
| 1998 | 43.20 million current US$ | -32.4% |
| 1999 | 70.95 million current US$ | +64.2% |
| 2000 | 32.44 million current US$ | -54.3% |
| 2001 | 96.66 million current US$ | +198.0% |
| 2002 | 70.15 million current US$ | -27.4% |
| 2003 | 185.09 million current US$ | +163.8% |
| 2004 | 161.89 million current US$ | -12.5% |
| 2005 | 155.76 million current US$ | -3.8% |
| 2006 | 188.76 million current US$ | +21.2% |
| 2007 | 187.11 million current US$ | -0.9% |
| 2008 | 184.81 million current US$ | -1.2% |
| 2009 | 138.40 million current US$ | -25.1% |
| 2010 | 192.60 million current US$ | +39.2% |
| 2011 | 140.48 million current US$ | -27.1% |
| 2012 | 132.70 million current US$ | -5.5% |
| 2013 | 106.70 million current US$ | -19.6% |
| 2014 | 99.02 million current US$ | -7.2% |
| 2015 | 122.64 million current US$ | +23.9% |
| 2016 | 95.11 million current US$ | -22.5% |
| 2017 | 126.89 million current US$ | +33.4% |
| 2018 | 157.63 million current US$ | +24.2% |
| 2019 | 86.40 million current US$ | -45.2% |
| 2020 | 99.52 million current US$ | +15.2% |
| 2021 | 138.77 million current US$ | +39.4% |
| 2022 | 101.06 million current US$ | -27.2% |
| 2023 | 120.60 million current US$ | +19.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 13.43 million current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | 29.20 million current US$ | 6 |
| 1980s | 34.13 million current US$ | 25.13 million current US$ | 51.52 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 63.70 million current US$ | 40.69 million current US$ | 111.50 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 140.11 million current US$ | 32.44 million current US$ | 188.76 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 126.02 million current US$ | 86.40 million current US$ | 192.60 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 114.99 million current US$ | 99.52 million current US$ | 138.77 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania, United Republic of
More aid effectiveness data for Tanzania, United Republic of
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 3.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 9.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 37.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 34.66 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 54.25 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 121.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 37.02 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 7.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 16.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway 51.14 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions in Tanzania, United Republic of was 120.60 million current US$ in 2023, according to Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 192.60 million current US$ in 2010.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions recorded in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was 30,000 current US$ in 1972.
- How does Tanzania, United Republic of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions?
- Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 43rd out of 172 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, european union institutions rising or falling in Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is up 13.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Tanzania, United Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions (current US$). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 50 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors are the net disbursements of official development assistance (ODA) or official aid from the members of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Net disbursements are gross disbursements of grants and loans minus repayments of principal on earlier loans. ODA consists of loans made on concessional terms (with a grant element of at least 25 percent, calculated at a rate of discount of 10 percent) and grants made to promote economic development and welfare in countries and territories in the DAC list of ODA recipients. Official aid refers to aid flows from official donors to countries and territories in part II of the DAC list of recipients: more advanced countries of Central and Eastern Europe, the countries of the former Soviet Union, and certain advanced developing countries and territories. Official aid is provided under terms and conditions similar to those for ODA. Part II of the DAC List was abolished in 2005. The collection of data on official aid and other resource flows to Part II countries ended with 2004 data. DAC members are Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and European Union Institutions. Regional aggregates include data for economies not specified elsewhere. World and income group totals include aid not allocated by country or region. Data are in current U.S. dollars.