Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) was 273.97 % change on previous year in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), 1972–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) is 273.97 % change on previous year, measured in 2022.
The figure is up 3,132.6% on the previous year and up 1,472.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) peaked at 875 % change on previous year in 1988 and was at its lowest, -195.24 % change on previous year, in 1982.
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 2nd of 46 groups on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 25 % change on previous year | — |
| 1973 | -40 % change on previous year | -260.0% |
| 1974 | 0 % change on previous year | -100.0% |
| 1975 | -66.67 % change on previous year | — |
| 1976 | 200 % change on previous year | -400.0% |
| 1981 | -89.6 % change on previous year | -144.8% |
| 1982 | -195.24 % change on previous year | +117.9% |
| 1983 | 15 % change on previous year | -107.7% |
| 1984 | 5.88 % change on previous year | -60.8% |
| 1985 | -12.5 % change on previous year | -312.5% |
| 1986 | 38.89 % change on previous year | -411.1% |
| 1987 | 609.09 % change on previous year | +1466.2% |
| 1988 | 875 % change on previous year | +43.7% |
| 1989 | -77.29 % change on previous year | -108.8% |
| 1991 | 386.14 % change on previous year | -599.6% |
| 1992 | -87.61 % change on previous year | -122.7% |
| 1993 | -10.62 % change on previous year | -87.9% |
| 1994 | 75.83 % change on previous year | -813.8% |
| 1995 | 25.64 % change on previous year | -66.2% |
| 1996 | 61 % change on previous year | +137.9% |
| 1997 | -6.96 % change on previous year | -111.4% |
| 1998 | 10.27 % change on previous year | -247.6% |
| 1999 | 37.31 % change on previous year | +263.3% |
| 2000 | -30.5 % change on previous year | -181.8% |
| 2001 | 2 % change on previous year | -106.6% |
| 2002 | -12.44 % change on previous year | -721.4% |
| 2003 | 15.29 % change on previous year | -222.8% |
| 2004 | 111.59 % change on previous year | +629.9% |
| 2005 | -77.43 % change on previous year | -169.4% |
| 2006 | 23.35 % change on previous year | -130.2% |
| 2007 | -22.23 % change on previous year | -195.2% |
| 2008 | 93.54 % change on previous year | -520.7% |
| 2009 | -16.75 % change on previous year | -117.9% |
| 2010 | -4.19 % change on previous year | -75.0% |
| 2011 | 0.5424 % change on previous year | -112.9% |
| 2012 | -19.96 % change on previous year | -3780.0% |
| 2013 | -1.54 % change on previous year | -92.3% |
| 2014 | 43.08 % change on previous year | -2896.2% |
| 2015 | -7.86 % change on previous year | -118.2% |
| 2016 | -8.16 % change on previous year | +3.8% |
| 2017 | 13.69 % change on previous year | -267.8% |
| 2018 | -31.44 % change on previous year | -329.6% |
| 2019 | 57.77 % change on previous year | -283.8% |
| 2020 | -36.75 % change on previous year | -163.6% |
| 2021 | -9.03 % change on previous year | -75.4% |
| 2022 | 273.97 % change on previous year | -3132.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 23.67 % change on previous year | -66.67 % change on previous year | 200 % change on previous year | 5 |
| 1980s | 129.91 % change on previous year | -195.24 % change on previous year | 875 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 1990s | 54.56 % change on previous year | -87.61 % change on previous year | 386.14 % change on previous year | 9 |
| 2000s | 8.64 % change on previous year | -77.43 % change on previous year | 111.59 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | 4.19 % change on previous year | -31.44 % change on previous year | 57.77 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 76.06 % change on previous year | -36.75 % change on previous year | 273.97 % change on previous year | 3 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 227.32 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 75.39 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.22 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 12.13 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 452.60 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.56 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.39 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 495.74 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 437.73 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.13 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) was 273.97 % change on previous year in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The highest recorded value was 875 % change on previous year in 1988.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) recorded in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- The lowest recorded value was -195.24 % change on previous year in 1982.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$)?
- Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 2nd out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,472.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 46 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.