Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) in Middle income
Middle income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) was 22.4 % change on previous year in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) in Middle income, 1972–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in % change on previous year.
Analysis
Middle income recorded 22.4 % change on previous year for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) in 2023.
The figure is up 407.3% on the previous year and up 22.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) in Middle income peaked at 121.46 % change on previous year in 1972 and was at its lowest, -43.24 % change on previous year, in 1993.
Middle income ranks 13th of 46 groups on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) in Middle income, year by year
| Year | % change on previous year | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1972 | 121.46 % change on previous year | — |
| 1973 | 116.09 % change on previous year | -4.4% |
| 1974 | 1.18 % change on previous year | -99.0% |
| 1975 | 94.48 % change on previous year | +7877.0% |
| 1976 | 4.86 % change on previous year | -94.9% |
| 1977 | -8.49 % change on previous year | -274.7% |
| 1978 | -17.03 % change on previous year | +100.6% |
| 1979 | 62.09 % change on previous year | -464.7% |
| 1980 | 61.43 % change on previous year | -1.1% |
| 1981 | 12.05 % change on previous year | -80.4% |
| 1982 | 9.13 % change on previous year | -24.2% |
| 1983 | 14.58 % change on previous year | +59.6% |
| 1984 | 19.23 % change on previous year | +31.9% |
| 1985 | 10.39 % change on previous year | -46.0% |
| 1986 | 32.45 % change on previous year | +212.4% |
| 1987 | 37.06 % change on previous year | +14.2% |
| 1988 | 53.19 % change on previous year | +43.5% |
| 1989 | 7.35 % change on previous year | -86.2% |
| 1990 | 4.01 % change on previous year | -45.4% |
| 1991 | 21.21 % change on previous year | +428.4% |
| 1992 | -19.29 % change on previous year | -191.0% |
| 1993 | -43.24 % change on previous year | +124.1% |
| 1994 | -15.15 % change on previous year | -65.0% |
| 1995 | 2.49 % change on previous year | -116.5% |
| 1996 | -3.87 % change on previous year | -255.0% |
| 1997 | -10.9 % change on previous year | +181.9% |
| 1998 | 6.88 % change on previous year | -163.2% |
| 1999 | 9.85 % change on previous year | +43.1% |
| 2000 | -14 % change on previous year | -242.1% |
| 2001 | -0.8283 % change on previous year | -94.1% |
| 2002 | 2.85 % change on previous year | -444.5% |
| 2003 | 16.05 % change on previous year | +462.3% |
| 2004 | 29.55 % change on previous year | +84.2% |
| 2005 | 90.86 % change on previous year | +207.5% |
| 2006 | -37.45 % change on previous year | -141.2% |
| 2007 | 17.82 % change on previous year | -147.6% |
| 2008 | 13.4 % change on previous year | -24.8% |
| 2009 | 9.87 % change on previous year | -26.3% |
| 2010 | 1.64 % change on previous year | -83.4% |
| 2011 | 0.1579 % change on previous year | -90.4% |
| 2012 | -20.43 % change on previous year | -13034.4% |
| 2013 | 18.29 % change on previous year | -189.5% |
| 2014 | 25.97 % change on previous year | +42.0% |
| 2015 | -39.72 % change on previous year | -252.9% |
| 2016 | -16.93 % change on previous year | -57.4% |
| 2017 | -9.2 % change on previous year | -45.7% |
| 2018 | -5.44 % change on previous year | -40.8% |
| 2019 | -16.68 % change on previous year | +206.3% |
| 2020 | 11.03 % change on previous year | -166.1% |
| 2021 | 27.8 % change on previous year | +152.0% |
| 2022 | -7.29 % change on previous year | -126.2% |
| 2023 | 22.4 % change on previous year | -407.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 46.83 % change on previous year | -17.03 % change on previous year | 121.46 % change on previous year | 8 |
| 1980s | 25.69 % change on previous year | 7.35 % change on previous year | 61.43 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 1990s | -4.8 % change on previous year | -43.24 % change on previous year | 21.21 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2000s | 12.81 % change on previous year | -37.45 % change on previous year | 90.86 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2010s | -6.23 % change on previous year | -39.72 % change on previous year | 25.97 % change on previous year | 10 |
| 2020s | 13.49 % change on previous year | -7.29 % change on previous year | 27.8 % change on previous year | 4 |
Countries ranked near Middle income
- 10 Kenya 198.31 % change on previous year compare
- 11 Timor-Leste 133.75 % change on previous year compare
- 12 India 125.2 % change on previous year compare
- 13 South Sudan 123.98 % change on previous year compare
- 14 Papua New Guinea 116.52 % change on previous year compare
- 15 Poland 109.16 % change on previous year compare
- 16 Sri Lanka 101.01 % change on previous year compare
More aid effectiveness data for Middle income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 373.41 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 293.75 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 3.42 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 28.12 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 6.29 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.17 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.38 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 463.14 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 10.26 billion current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) in Middle income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) in Middle income was 22.4 % change on previous year in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) recorded in Middle income?
- The highest recorded value was 121.46 % change on previous year in 1972.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) recorded in Middle income?
- The lowest recorded value was -43.24 % change on previous year in 1993.
- How does Middle income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$)?
- Middle income ranks 13th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$) rising or falling in Middle income?
- Over the last ten years it is up 22.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Middle income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), annual growth rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.