Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in El Salvador
El Salvador: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps was 109,509 current US$ in 2015. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in El Salvador, 1981–2015
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2015, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in El Salvador stood at 109,509 current US$.
That represents a change of down 3.4% on the previous year and down 70.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in El Salvador peaked at 780,000 current US$ in 1991 and was at its lowest, -30,000 current US$, in 1994.
El Salvador ranks 91st of 146 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in El Salvador, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1981 | 190,000 current US$ | — |
| 1982 | 240,000 current US$ | +26.3% |
| 1983 | 100,000 current US$ | -58.3% |
| 1984 | 70,000 current US$ | -30.0% |
| 1985 | 340,000 current US$ | +385.7% |
| 1986 | 610,000 current US$ | +79.4% |
| 1987 | 230,000 current US$ | -62.3% |
| 1988 | 10,000 current US$ | -95.7% |
| 1989 | 190,000 current US$ | +1800.0% |
| 1990 | 60,000 current US$ | -68.4% |
| 1991 | 780,000 current US$ | +1200.0% |
| 1992 | 300,000 current US$ | -61.5% |
| 1993 | 135,000 current US$ | -55.0% |
| 1994 | -30,000 current US$ | -122.2% |
| 1995 | 26,667 current US$ | -188.9% |
| 1996 | 83,333 current US$ | +212.5% |
| 1997 | 140,000 current US$ | +68.0% |
| 1998 | 80,000 current US$ | -42.9% |
| 1999 | 240,000 current US$ | +200.0% |
| 2000 | 110,000 current US$ | -54.2% |
| 2001 | 560,000 current US$ | +409.1% |
| 2002 | 420,000 current US$ | -25.0% |
| 2003 | 570,000 current US$ | +35.7% |
| 2004 | 480,000 current US$ | -15.8% |
| 2005 | 370,000 current US$ | -22.9% |
| 2006 | 80,000 current US$ | -78.4% |
| 2007 | 223,333 current US$ | +179.2% |
| 2008 | 366,667 current US$ | +64.2% |
| 2009 | 510,000 current US$ | +39.1% |
| 2010 | 140,000 current US$ | -72.5% |
| 2011 | 670,000 current US$ | +378.6% |
| 2012 | 109,356 current US$ | -83.7% |
| 2013 | 129,855 current US$ | +18.7% |
| 2014 | 113,341 current US$ | -12.7% |
| 2015 | 109,509 current US$ | -3.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 220,000 current US$ | 10,000 current US$ | 610,000 current US$ | 9 |
| 1990s | 181,500 current US$ | -30,000 current US$ | 780,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 369,000 current US$ | 80,000 current US$ | 570,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 212,010 current US$ | 109,356 current US$ | 670,000 current US$ | 6 |
Countries ranked near El Salvador
More aid effectiveness data for El Salvador
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 471,296 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1.36 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 6.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 15.97 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.73 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 608,949 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 3.97 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 74,038 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 11.08 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 41.44 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in El Salvador?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in El Salvador was 109,509 current US$ in 2015, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps recorded in El Salvador?
- The highest recorded value was 780,000 current US$ in 1991.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps recorded in El Salvador?
- The lowest recorded value was -30,000 current US$ in 1994.
- How does El Salvador rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- El Salvador ranks 91st out of 146 countries with data for 2015.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps rising or falling in El Salvador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 70.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this El Salvador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.