Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps was 137.39 million current US$ in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), 1971–2022
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2022, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) stood at 137.39 million current US$.
The figure is down 15.1% on the previous year and down 40.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) peaked at 264.87 million current US$ in 2014 and was at its lowest, 1.23 million current US$, in 1971.
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 10th of 46 groups on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1971 | 1.23 million current US$ | — |
| 1972 | 3.51 million current US$ | +185.4% |
| 1973 | 4.98 million current US$ | +41.9% |
| 1974 | 9.55 million current US$ | +91.8% |
| 1975 | 15.63 million current US$ | +63.7% |
| 1976 | 21.46 million current US$ | +37.3% |
| 1977 | 17.24 million current US$ | -19.7% |
| 1978 | 18.40 million current US$ | +6.7% |
| 1979 | 24.57 million current US$ | +33.5% |
| 1980 | 31.88 million current US$ | +29.8% |
| 1981 | 32.93 million current US$ | +3.3% |
| 1982 | 37.81 million current US$ | +14.8% |
| 1983 | 45.61 million current US$ | +20.6% |
| 1984 | 47.61 million current US$ | +4.4% |
| 1985 | 52.76 million current US$ | +10.8% |
| 1986 | 88.32 million current US$ | +67.4% |
| 1987 | 115.79 million current US$ | +31.1% |
| 1988 | 181.94 million current US$ | +57.1% |
| 1989 | 174.69 million current US$ | -4.0% |
| 1990 | 177.58 million current US$ | +1.7% |
| 1991 | 182.82 million current US$ | +3.0% |
| 1992 | 134.67 million current US$ | -26.3% |
| 1993 | 57.92 million current US$ | -57.0% |
| 1994 | 68.24 million current US$ | +17.8% |
| 1995 | 59.52 million current US$ | -12.8% |
| 1996 | 59.58 million current US$ | +0.1% |
| 1997 | 52.06 million current US$ | -12.6% |
| 1998 | 58.07 million current US$ | +11.5% |
| 1999 | 61.81 million current US$ | +6.4% |
| 2000 | 57.22 million current US$ | -7.4% |
| 2001 | 62.95 million current US$ | +10.0% |
| 2002 | 70.69 million current US$ | +12.3% |
| 2003 | 91.67 million current US$ | +29.7% |
| 2004 | 114.10 million current US$ | +24.5% |
| 2005 | 128.36 million current US$ | +12.5% |
| 2006 | 157.28 million current US$ | +22.5% |
| 2007 | 204.03 million current US$ | +29.7% |
| 2008 | 214.50 million current US$ | +5.1% |
| 2009 | 245.43 million current US$ | +14.4% |
| 2010 | 262.36 million current US$ | +6.9% |
| 2011 | 253.62 million current US$ | -3.3% |
| 2012 | 229.70 million current US$ | -9.4% |
| 2013 | 238.68 million current US$ | +3.9% |
| 2014 | 264.87 million current US$ | +11.0% |
| 2015 | 180.26 million current US$ | -31.9% |
| 2016 | 136.20 million current US$ | -24.4% |
| 2017 | 110.56 million current US$ | -18.8% |
| 2018 | 105.75 million current US$ | -4.4% |
| 2019 | 131.76 million current US$ | +24.6% |
| 2020 | 146.70 million current US$ | +11.3% |
| 2021 | 161.82 million current US$ | +10.3% |
| 2022 | 137.39 million current US$ | -15.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 12.95 million current US$ | 1.23 million current US$ | 24.57 million current US$ | 9 |
| 1980s | 80.93 million current US$ | 31.88 million current US$ | 181.94 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 91.23 million current US$ | 52.06 million current US$ | 182.82 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 134.62 million current US$ | 57.22 million current US$ | 245.43 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 191.38 million current US$ | 105.75 million current US$ | 264.87 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 148.64 million current US$ | 137.39 million current US$ | 161.82 million current US$ | 3 |
Countries ranked near Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- 7 Nepal 18.66 million current US$ compare
- 8 Mozambique 17.81 million current US$ compare
- 9 Syrian Arab Republic 17.65 million current US$ compare
- 10 Tanzania, United Republic of 14.61 million current US$ compare
- 11 Myanmar 13.49 million current US$ compare
- 12 Palestine, State of 9.32 million current US$ compare
- 13 Türkiye 9.13 million current US$ compare
More aid effectiveness data for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 61.63 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 413.84 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.20 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 3.27 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 534.00 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 2.57 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.55 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 1.14 billion current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 362.50 million current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.27 billion current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) was 137.39 million current US$ in 2022, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The highest recorded value was 264.87 million current US$ in 2014.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps recorded in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.23 million current US$ in 1971.
- How does Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps?
- Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 10th out of 46 groups with data for 2022.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)?
- Over the last ten years it is down 40.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 52 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) with 415 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.