Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per in High income
High income: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per in High income, 1970–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per in High income is 0 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per in High income peaked at 0.1734 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990 and was at its lowest, -0.0689 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2005.
High income ranks 45th of 46 groups on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per in High income, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1970 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1971 | 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1972 | 0.008 current US$ per square kilometre | +1300.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0134 current US$ per square kilometre | +67.9% |
| 1974 | 0.012 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1975 | 0.0034 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.4% |
| 1976 | 0.0026 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1977 | 0.0011 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.6% |
| 1978 | 0.0026 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.0% |
| 1979 | 0.0009 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.7% |
| 1980 | 0.0077 current US$ per square kilometre | +800.0% |
| 1981 | 0.0051 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 1982 | 0.0054 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 1983 | 0.0023 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.9% |
| 1984 | 0.002 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 1985 | 0.0028 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.9% |
| 1986 | 0.0305 current US$ per square kilometre | +970.0% |
| 1987 | 0.0054 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.2% |
| 1988 | 0.0262 current US$ per square kilometre | +384.2% |
| 1989 | 0.0253 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.3% |
| 1990 | 0.1734 current US$ per square kilometre | +584.3% |
| 1991 | 0.0723 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.3% |
| 1992 | 0.0508 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.7% |
| 1993 | 0.1234 current US$ per square kilometre | +142.8% |
| 1994 | -0.0102 current US$ per square kilometre | -108.3% |
| 1995 | -0.006 current US$ per square kilometre | -41.5% |
| 1996 | -0.0141 current US$ per square kilometre | +135.5% |
| 1997 | 0.0067 current US$ per square kilometre | -147.9% |
| 1998 | -0.0037 current US$ per square kilometre | -154.3% |
| 1999 | 0.0062 current US$ per square kilometre | -268.4% |
| 2000 | 0.0171 current US$ per square kilometre | +178.0% |
| 2001 | 0.0117 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 2002 | 0.0048 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.0% |
| 2003 | 0.0117 current US$ per square kilometre | +144.0% |
| 2004 | 0.0256 current US$ per square kilometre | +118.0% |
| 2005 | -0.0689 current US$ per square kilometre | -369.2% |
| 2006 | 0.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -114.5% |
| 2007 | 0.0364 current US$ per square kilometre | +263.5% |
| 2008 | 0.0514 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.3% |
| 2009 | 0.0356 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.7% |
| 2010 | 0.0343 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2011 | 0.0135 current US$ per square kilometre | -60.7% |
| 2012 | 0.0234 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.5% |
| 2013 | 0.0206 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.8% |
| 2014 | 0.0128 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0074 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0068 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.6% |
| 2017 | 0.0017 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 2018 | 0.0012 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.5% |
| 2019 | 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.1% |
| 2020 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 2021 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2022 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 2023 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per in High income changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1972 | +1300.0% | 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.008 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1986 | +970.0% | 0.0028 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0305 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1980 | +800.0% | 0.0009 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0077 current US$ per square kilometre |
| 1990 | +584.3% | 0.0253 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1734 current US$ per square kilometre |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.0044 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0134 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0113 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.002 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0305 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0399 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0141 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1734 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0135 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.0689 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0514 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0122 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0006 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.0343 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near High income
- 42 Uzbekistan 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 43 East Timor 5.31 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 44 El Salvador 5.29 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 45 Guinea-Bissau 5.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 46 Kuwait 5.05 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 47 North Korea 4.91 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 48 Ghana 4.66 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for High income
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 327,620 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 0 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 13.06 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.84 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 233,494 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 7.95 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 61.44 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 277,565 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 902,924 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 213.34 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per in High income?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per in High income was 0 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per recorded in High income?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1734 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per recorded in High income?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.0689 current US$ per square kilometre in 2005.
- How does High income rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per?
- High income ranks 45th out of 46 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per rising or falling in High income?
- Over the last ten years it is down 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this High income data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.