Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per in Liberia
Liberia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per was 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per in Liberia, 1973–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Liberia recorded 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per in 2023.
That represents a change of down 26.1% on the previous year and down 92.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per in Liberia peaked at 31.98 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008 and was at its lowest, 0.1038 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1973.
Liberia ranks 77th of 145 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per in Liberia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1973 | 0.1038 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1974 | 0.3115 current US$ per square kilometre | +200.0% |
| 1975 | 0.5191 current US$ per square kilometre | +66.7% |
| 1976 | 0.1038 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 1977 | 0.1038 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1980 | 0.1038 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1981 | 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +12300.0% |
| 1982 | 6.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.6% |
| 1986 | 0.1038 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.3% |
| 1990 | 4.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +4400.0% |
| 1991 | 13.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +197.8% |
| 1992 | 5.29 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.9% |
| 1993 | 4.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.7% |
| 1994 | 6.96 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.3% |
| 1995 | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -65.7% |
| 1996 | 7.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +221.7% |
| 1997 | 2.8 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.5% |
| 1998 | 5.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +111.1% |
| 1999 | 8.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.1% |
| 2000 | 5.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -32.1% |
| 2001 | 9.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +63.6% |
| 2002 | 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.9% |
| 2003 | 15.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +219.6% |
| 2004 | 28.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +87.8% |
| 2005 | 17.75 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.0% |
| 2006 | 13.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.6% |
| 2007 | 21.28 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.0% |
| 2008 | 31.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +50.2% |
| 2009 | 22.01 current US$ per square kilometre | -31.2% |
| 2010 | 6.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.4% |
| 2011 | 20.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +197.0% |
| 2012 | 18.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.3% |
| 2013 | 19.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.0% |
| 2014 | 3 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.4% |
| 2015 | 5.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.7% |
| 2016 | 4.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.5% |
| 2017 | 8.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.9% |
| 2018 | 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.6% |
| 2019 | 0.1953 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.7% |
| 2020 | 1.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +808.4% |
| 2021 | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.8% |
| 2022 | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +81.1% |
| 2023 | 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0.2284 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1038 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.5191 current US$ per square kilometre | 5 |
| 1980s | 4.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1038 current US$ per square kilometre | 12.87 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1990s | 6.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 13.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 17.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.78 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 8.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1953 current US$ per square kilometre | 20.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Liberia
- 74 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1.67 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 75 India 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 76 Belize 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 78 Belarus 1.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 79 Fiji 1.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 80 Cyprus 1.08 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Liberia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 41,902 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 736 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.42 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 59.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 29,494 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 25.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 2.94 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 86,452 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 9.13 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per in Liberia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per in Liberia was 1.45 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per recorded in Liberia?
- The highest recorded value was 31.98 current US$ per square kilometre in 2008.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per recorded in Liberia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1038 current US$ per square kilometre in 1973.
- How does Liberia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per?
- Liberia ranks 77th out of 145 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, finland (current us$), per rising or falling in Liberia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 92.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Liberia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 43 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Finland (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.