Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Latvia

Latvia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 0.8749 current US$ per person in 2004. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2004)
0.8749 current US$ per person
Change on year
down 43.5%
World rank
80th
of 168 countries
All-time high
1.55 current US$ per person
in 2003
All-time low
0.1109 current US$ per person
in 1992
Years of data
13
1992–2004

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Latvia, 1992–2004

00.511.51992199820041992: 0.111 current US$ per person1993: 0.16 current US$ per person1994: 0.155 current US$ per person1995: 0.33 current US$ per person1996: 0.407 current US$ per person1997: 0.243 current US$ per person1998: 1.4 current US$ per person1999: 0.339 current US$ per person2000: 0.473 current US$ per person2001: 0.398 current US$ per person2002: 0.61 current US$ per person2003: 1.5 current US$ per person2004: 0.875 current US$ per person

Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per person.

Analysis

In 2004, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Latvia stood at 0.8749 current US$ per person.

The figure is down 43.5% on the previous year and up 465.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Latvia peaked at 1.55 current US$ per person in 2003 and was at its lowest, 0.1109 current US$ per person, in 1992.

Latvia ranks 80th of 168 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Latvia, year by year

Annual values for Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per capita in Latvia, 1992 to 2004.
Year current US$ per person Change
1992 0.1109 current US$ per person
1993 0.16 current US$ per person +44.2%
1994 0.1547 current US$ per person -3.3%
1995 0.33 current US$ per person +113.3%
1996 0.407 current US$ per person +23.3%
1997 0.2425 current US$ per person -40.4%
1998 1.39 current US$ per person +471.5%
1999 0.3388 current US$ per person -75.6%
2000 0.4731 current US$ per person +39.6%
2001 0.3979 current US$ per person -15.9%
2002 0.6103 current US$ per person +53.4%
2003 1.55 current US$ per person +153.5%
2004 0.8749 current US$ per person -43.5%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1990s 0.3912 current US$ per person 0.1109 current US$ per person 1.39 current US$ per person 8
2000s 0.7807 current US$ per person 0.3979 current US$ per person 1.55 current US$ per person 5

Countries ranked near Latvia

  1. 77 Bangladesh 0.9095 current US$ per person compare
  2. 78 Kuwait 0.8802 current US$ per person
  3. 79 Croatia 0.8777 current US$ per person compare
  4. 81 Mali 0.8438 current US$ per person compare
  5. 82 Malta 0.8334 current US$ per person compare
  6. 83 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 0.8246 current US$ per person compare

See the full ranking of 215 places →

More aid effectiveness data for Latvia

All data for Latvia →

Frequently asked questions

What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Latvia?
Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Latvia was 0.8749 current US$ per person in 2004, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Latvia?
The highest recorded value was 1.55 current US$ per person in 2003.
What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Latvia?
The lowest recorded value was 0.1109 current US$ per person in 1992.
How does Latvia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
Latvia ranks 80th out of 168 countries with data for 2004.
Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Latvia?
Over the last ten years it is up 465.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Latvia data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per capita. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Latvia. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us-per-capita/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://aid.statizoid.com/stat/net-bilateral-aid-flows-from-dac-donors-france-current-us-per-capita/latvia/">Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Latvia</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Population, total

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per capita
Unit
current US$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
215 places, 9,265 data points, 1960–2023
Last refreshed

Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.