Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Botswana
Botswana: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 0.5934 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Botswana, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Botswana is 0.5934 current US$ per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
That represents a change of down 85.2% on the previous year and down 34.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Botswana peaked at 16.3 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007 and was at its lowest, 0.1342 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2018.
That places Botswana 156th out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Botswana, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 0.3529 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 0.247 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 1982 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +642.9% |
| 1983 | 0.3529 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.8% |
| 1984 | 0.5646 current US$ per square kilometre | +60.0% |
| 1985 | 0.5999 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.2% |
| 1986 | 2.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +350.0% |
| 1987 | 4.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.0% |
| 1988 | 2.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.1% |
| 1989 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.3% |
| 1990 | 3.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +217.6% |
| 1991 | 3.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 1992 | 3.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 1993 | 1.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.9% |
| 1994 | 1.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.3% |
| 1995 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1996 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 1997 | 1.24 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 1999 | 0.9352 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.4% |
| 2000 | 1.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.4% |
| 2001 | 0.7234 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.3% |
| 2002 | 1.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.1% |
| 2003 | 2.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +90.6% |
| 2004 | 3.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.7% |
| 2005 | 2.38 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.9% |
| 2006 | 2.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +7.4% |
| 2007 | 16.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +537.2% |
| 2008 | 4.27 current US$ per square kilometre | -73.8% |
| 2009 | 1.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -57.0% |
| 2010 | 11.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +521.2% |
| 2011 | 1.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -89.5% |
| 2012 | 0.9352 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.1% |
| 2013 | 0.8999 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2014 | 0.8293 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.8% |
| 2015 | 0.5436 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.5% |
| 2016 | 0.4365 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.7% |
| 2017 | 0.2361 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.9% |
| 2018 | 0.1342 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.1% |
| 2019 | 0.19 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.5% |
| 2020 | 0.2725 current US$ per square kilometre | +43.5% |
| 2021 | 2.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +885.6% |
| 2022 | 4.01 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.4% |
| 2023 | 0.5934 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 1.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.247 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.9352 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 3.57 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.7234 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.68 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.1342 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.4 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2725 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Botswana
- 153 Turkmenistan 0.7967 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 154 Namibia 0.771 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 155 Papua New Guinea 0.7274 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 157 Bhutan 0.3639 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 158 Belize 0.2806 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 159 Solomon Islands 0.0111 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Botswana
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 26,363 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium -71,278 current US$ (2016)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 144,572 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 9.10 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 20,000 current US$ (1997)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 857,044 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 336,317 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 383,188 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 12,251 current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 110.59 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Botswana?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Botswana was 0.5934 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Botswana?
- The highest recorded value was 16.3 current US$ per square kilometre in 2007.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Botswana?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1342 current US$ per square kilometre in 2018.
- How does Botswana rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- Botswana ranks 156th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Botswana?
- Over the last ten years it is down 34.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Botswana data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.