Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in China
China: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was -5.18 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in China, 1981–2020
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
China recorded -5.18 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in 2020. That is the lowest value across all 40 years on record.
That represents a change of down 172.0% on the previous year and down 115.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in China peaked at 38.81 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009 and was at its lowest, -5.18 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2020.
That places China 161st out of 167 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in China, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1981 | 0.2887 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1982 | 0.2429 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.9% |
| 1983 | 0.5006 current US$ per square kilometre | +106.1% |
| 1984 | 0.6359 current US$ per square kilometre | +27.0% |
| 1985 | 0.6711 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 1986 | 1.06 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.3% |
| 1987 | 5 current US$ per square kilometre | +373.7% |
| 1988 | 14.27 current US$ per square kilometre | +185.4% |
| 1989 | 19.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +34.3% |
| 1990 | 9.37 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.1% |
| 1991 | 14.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.3% |
| 1992 | 16.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.8% |
| 1993 | 10.92 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.1% |
| 1994 | 10.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.8% |
| 1995 | 9.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.6% |
| 1996 | 10.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +6.6% |
| 1997 | 5.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.4% |
| 1998 | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.6% |
| 1999 | 4.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.1% |
| 2000 | 4.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.4% |
| 2001 | 4.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2002 | 8.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.4% |
| 2003 | 7.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.8% |
| 2004 | 10.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +38.4% |
| 2005 | 13.34 current US$ per square kilometre | +21.8% |
| 2006 | 15.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +14.1% |
| 2007 | 14.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -7.4% |
| 2008 | 22.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +56.8% |
| 2009 | 38.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.6% |
| 2010 | 33.73 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 2011 | 30.99 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.1% |
| 2012 | 30.69 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2013 | 15.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.4% |
| 2014 | 9.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -38.3% |
| 2015 | 7.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.3% |
| 2016 | 6.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 2017 | 6.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2018 | -3.48 current US$ per square kilometre | -150.6% |
| 2019 | 7.19 current US$ per square kilometre | -306.7% |
| 2020 | -5.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -172.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 4.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.2429 current US$ per square kilometre | 19.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1990s | 9.53 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.17 current US$ per square kilometre | 16.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 14.01 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 38.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 14.52 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.48 current US$ per square kilometre | 33.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | -5.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.18 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.18 current US$ per square kilometre | 1 |
Countries ranked near China
- 158 Belize 0.2806 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 159 Solomon Islands 0.0111 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 160 Kenya -4.57 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 162 Suriname -8.54 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 163 Uganda -11.43 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 164 Saint Kitts and Nevis -76.92 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for China
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 8.63 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 100,022 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada -11.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 120.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.00 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 216.65 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France -48.60 million current US$ (2020)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 8.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -8.89 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -521.78 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in China?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in China was -5.18 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was 38.81 current US$ per square kilometre in 2009.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was -5.18 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- How does China rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- China ranks 161st out of 167 countries with data for 2020.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is down 115.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.