Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Costa Rica
Costa Rica: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 1,184 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Costa Rica, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Costa Rica recorded 1,184 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is down 45.3% on the previous year and up 966.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Costa Rica peaked at 2,958 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 7.05 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1981.
That places Costa Rica 22nd out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Costa Rica, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 7.83 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 7.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.0% |
| 1982 | 8.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.9% |
| 1983 | 13.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +70.7% |
| 1984 | 20.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.4% |
| 1985 | 18.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.4% |
| 1986 | 37.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.9% |
| 1987 | 100.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +172.0% |
| 1988 | 72.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.8% |
| 1989 | 55.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -24.0% |
| 1990 | 68.35 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.8% |
| 1991 | 65.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.6% |
| 1992 | 68.94 current US$ per square kilometre | +5.7% |
| 1993 | 67.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.0% |
| 1994 | 74.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.1% |
| 1995 | 113.2 current US$ per square kilometre | +52.1% |
| 1996 | 100.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.2% |
| 1997 | 70.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.0% |
| 1998 | 44.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.3% |
| 1999 | 57.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.1% |
| 2000 | 51.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.2% |
| 2001 | 278.69 current US$ per square kilometre | +437.0% |
| 2002 | 94.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.1% |
| 2003 | 113.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.1% |
| 2004 | 113.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 2005 | 95.77 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.4% |
| 2006 | 105.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.8% |
| 2007 | 451.43 current US$ per square kilometre | +329.2% |
| 2008 | 130.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -71.2% |
| 2009 | 91.85 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.4% |
| 2010 | 93.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2011 | 64.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.5% |
| 2012 | 97.92 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.5% |
| 2013 | 111.05 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.4% |
| 2014 | 112.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2015 | 96.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.2% |
| 2016 | 91.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -5.3% |
| 2017 | 87.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.9% |
| 2018 | 85.86 current US$ per square kilometre | -1.6% |
| 2019 | 82.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2020 | 2,958 current US$ per square kilometre | +3473.0% |
| 2021 | 109.42 current US$ per square kilometre | -96.3% |
| 2022 | 2,164 current US$ per square kilometre | +1877.9% |
| 2023 | 1,184 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 34.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 100.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 73.03 current US$ per square kilometre | 44.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 113.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 152.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 51.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 451.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 92.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 64.63 current US$ per square kilometre | 112.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 1,604 current US$ per square kilometre | 109.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 2,958 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Costa Rica
- 19 Republic of Moldova 1,479 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 20 Benin 1,325 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 21 Bangladesh 1,200 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 23 Togo 1,177 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 24 Malta 1,031 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 25 Gibraltar 1,000 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Costa Rica
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 287,578 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 55,010 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 734,559 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 2.91 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 31,872 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 5.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 60.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 414,114 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 576,025 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -3.09 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Costa Rica?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Costa Rica was 1,184 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Costa Rica?
- The highest recorded value was 2,958 current US$ per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Costa Rica?
- The lowest recorded value was 7.05 current US$ per square kilometre in 1981.
- How does Costa Rica rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- Costa Rica ranks 22nd out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Costa Rica?
- Over the last ten years it is up 966.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Costa Rica data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.