Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Eswatini
Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 452.77 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Eswatini, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Eswatini stood at 452.77 current US$ per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 44 years on record.
That represents a change of up 4,534.9% on the previous year and up 6,389.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Eswatini peaked at 452.77 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, -102.91 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1998.
Eswatini ranks 36th of 167 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 5.81 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 2.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 1982 | 5.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +100.0% |
| 1983 | 3.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.0% |
| 1984 | 8.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +133.3% |
| 1985 | 40.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +400.0% |
| 1986 | 56.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +40.0% |
| 1987 | 18.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.3% |
| 1988 | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -87.5% |
| 1989 | 11.63 current US$ per square kilometre | +400.0% |
| 1990 | 9.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.0% |
| 1991 | 3.49 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.5% |
| 1992 | 3.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 9.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +166.7% |
| 1994 | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.2% |
| 1995 | -0.5814 current US$ per square kilometre | -133.3% |
| 1996 | -2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 1997 | -1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 1998 | -102.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +5800.0% |
| 1999 | 4.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -104.5% |
| 2000 | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.0% |
| 2001 | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2002 | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -25.0% |
| 2003 | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.3% |
| 2004 | 4.65 current US$ per square kilometre | +300.0% |
| 2005 | 10.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +125.0% |
| 2006 | 12.79 current US$ per square kilometre | +22.2% |
| 2007 | 17.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +36.4% |
| 2008 | 17.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 9.3 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.7% |
| 2010 | 9.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 12.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +31.2% |
| 2012 | 6.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 2013 | 6.98 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 8.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.0% |
| 2015 | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.1% |
| 2016 | 7.1 current US$ per square kilometre | +25.6% |
| 2017 | 8.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.0% |
| 2018 | 14.95 current US$ per square kilometre | +86.2% |
| 2019 | 32.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +114.4% |
| 2020 | 14.81 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.8% |
| 2021 | 8.47 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.8% |
| 2022 | 9.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +15.3% |
| 2023 | 452.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +4534.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 15.64 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.33 current US$ per square kilometre | 56.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | -7.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -102.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.3 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 7.97 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 17.44 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 11.2 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.66 current US$ per square kilometre | 32.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 121.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.47 current US$ per square kilometre | 452.77 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 33 Armenia 498.58 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Israel 492.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 35 Guinea 456.03 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 37 Vanuatu 442.04 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 38 Syria 392.89 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 39 Egypt 379.3 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Eswatini
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24,761 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1,889 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 585,648 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 13.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 912,632 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 178,216 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 7.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 165,318 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -567,147 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -415,180 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Eswatini?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Eswatini was 452.77 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 452.77 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was -102.91 current US$ per square kilometre in 1998.
- How does Eswatini rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- Eswatini ranks 36th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6,389.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.