Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income): Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 107.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2023)
107.79 current US$ per square kilometre
Change on year
down 54.4%
Rank
16th
of 45 groups
All-time high
236.14 current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
All-time low
-3.83 current US$ per square kilometre
in 1975
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) recorded 107.79 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is down 54.4% on the previous year and up 1,039.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) peaked at 236.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, -3.83 current US$ per square kilometre, in 1975.
That places Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) 16th out of 45 groups with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income), year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1963 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1964 | 7.65 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1965 | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | -100.0% |
| 1966 | 9.66 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1967 | 9.91 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1968 | 3.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.3% |
| 1969 | 4.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.7% |
| 1970 | 3.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -22.9% |
| 1971 | 8.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +148.1% |
| 1972 | 23.8 current US$ per square kilometre | +183.1% |
| 1973 | 1.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.7% |
| 1974 | 0.3639 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.8% |
| 1975 | -3.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -1151.7% |
| 1976 | 1 current US$ per square kilometre | -126.2% |
| 1977 | -2.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -362.5% |
| 1978 | -1.51 current US$ per square kilometre | -42.9% |
| 1979 | -3.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +130.8% |
| 1980 | 47.5 current US$ per square kilometre | -1466.8% |
| 1981 | 25.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -46.8% |
| 1982 | 32.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +29.8% |
| 1983 | 26.21 current US$ per square kilometre | -20.1% |
| 1984 | 10.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -59.7% |
| 1985 | 6.41 current US$ per square kilometre | -39.3% |
| 1986 | 16.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +156.9% |
| 1987 | 22.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +35.5% |
| 1988 | 31.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +41.1% |
| 1989 | 51.83 current US$ per square kilometre | +64.6% |
| 1990 | 87.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +69.2% |
| 1991 | 70.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -19.5% |
| 1992 | 11.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.9% |
| 1993 | 12.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 1994 | 10.44 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.5% |
| 1995 | 5.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -43.5% |
| 1996 | 11.17 current US$ per square kilometre | +89.4% |
| 1997 | 8.56 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.3% |
| 1998 | 10.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +20.3% |
| 1999 | 34.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +231.2% |
| 2000 | 11.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -66.9% |
| 2001 | 7.96 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.4% |
| 2002 | 24.13 current US$ per square kilometre | +203.2% |
| 2003 | 41.87 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.5% |
| 2004 | 10.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -74.3% |
| 2005 | 20.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +92.8% |
| 2006 | 38.03 current US$ per square kilometre | +83.4% |
| 2007 | 36.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.5% |
| 2008 | 72.84 current US$ per square kilometre | +98.5% |
| 2009 | 47.02 current US$ per square kilometre | -35.4% |
| 2010 | 30.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.1% |
| 2011 | 56.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +88.0% |
| 2012 | 9.2 current US$ per square kilometre | -83.7% |
| 2013 | 9.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2014 | 46.71 current US$ per square kilometre | +393.9% |
| 2015 | 2.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.6% |
| 2016 | 40.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +1268.0% |
| 2017 | 86.07 current US$ per square kilometre | +111.2% |
| 2018 | 63.06 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.7% |
| 2019 | 79.46 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.0% |
| 2020 | 131.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +65.2% |
| 2021 | 77.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.7% |
| 2022 | 236.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +203.4% |
| 2023 | 107.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.92 current US$ per square kilometre | 0 current US$ per square kilometre | 9.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 2.7 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 23.8 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 27.09 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.41 current US$ per square kilometre | 51.83 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 26.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.9 current US$ per square kilometre | 87.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 31.13 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.96 current US$ per square kilometre | 72.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 42.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.98 current US$ per square kilometre | 86.07 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 138.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 77.84 current US$ per square kilometre | 236.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- 13 Saint Lucia 2,120 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 14 Serbia 1,997 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 15 Hong Kong, China 1,962 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 16 Côte d'Ivoire 1,707 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 17 Bahrain 1,575 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 18 Senegal 1,572 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 19 Republic of Moldova 1,479 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 197.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 85.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.03 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 23.30 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 419.07 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 1.28 billion current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 636.78 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 416.09 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 92.55 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 1.20 billion current US$ (2023)
All data for Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) →
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) was 107.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The highest recorded value was 236.14 current US$ per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- The lowest recorded value was -3.83 current US$ per square kilometre in 1975.
- How does Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) ranks 16th out of 45 groups with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1,039.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Europe & Central Asia (excluding high income) data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.