Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Gambia
Gambia: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 530.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Gambia, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Gambia stood at 530.59 current US$ per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 16.4% on the previous year and up 701.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Gambia peaked at 595.85 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990 and was at its lowest, -34.79 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2017.
That places Gambia 31st out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Gambia, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 108.7 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 56.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -48.2% |
| 1982 | 83.99 current US$ per square kilometre | +49.1% |
| 1983 | 45.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.9% |
| 1984 | 284.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +526.1% |
| 1985 | 351.78 current US$ per square kilometre | +23.6% |
| 1986 | 573.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +62.9% |
| 1987 | 450.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -21.4% |
| 1988 | 107.71 current US$ per square kilometre | -76.1% |
| 1989 | 342.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +218.3% |
| 1990 | 595.85 current US$ per square kilometre | +73.8% |
| 1991 | 505.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.1% |
| 1992 | 504.94 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.2% |
| 1993 | 527.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +4.5% |
| 1994 | 253.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.9% |
| 1995 | 186.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.5% |
| 1996 | 85.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.0% |
| 1997 | 61.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.7% |
| 1998 | 54.35 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.3% |
| 1999 | 105.73 current US$ per square kilometre | +94.5% |
| 2000 | 5.93 current US$ per square kilometre | -94.4% |
| 2001 | 50.4 current US$ per square kilometre | +750.0% |
| 2002 | 35.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.4% |
| 2003 | 35.57 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 14.82 current US$ per square kilometre | -58.3% |
| 2005 | 26.68 current US$ per square kilometre | +80.0% |
| 2006 | 62.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +133.3% |
| 2007 | 73.12 current US$ per square kilometre | +17.5% |
| 2008 | 45.45 current US$ per square kilometre | -37.8% |
| 2009 | 33.6 current US$ per square kilometre | -26.1% |
| 2010 | 34.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 2011 | 34.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 44.47 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.6% |
| 2013 | 66.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.9% |
| 2014 | 29.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -55.2% |
| 2015 | 95.15 current US$ per square kilometre | +221.0% |
| 2016 | 6.62 current US$ per square kilometre | -93.0% |
| 2017 | -34.79 current US$ per square kilometre | -625.7% |
| 2018 | 589.89 current US$ per square kilometre | -1795.4% |
| 2019 | 291.28 current US$ per square kilometre | -50.6% |
| 2020 | 109.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -62.5% |
| 2021 | 102.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -6.0% |
| 2022 | 455.74 current US$ per square kilometre | +343.7% |
| 2023 | 530.59 current US$ per square kilometre | +16.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 240.51 current US$ per square kilometre | 45.45 current US$ per square kilometre | 573.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 288.24 current US$ per square kilometre | 54.35 current US$ per square kilometre | 595.85 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 38.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.93 current US$ per square kilometre | 73.12 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 115.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.79 current US$ per square kilometre | 589.89 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 299.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 102.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 530.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Gambia
- 28 Poland 641.53 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 29 Morocco 623.09 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 30 Georgia 531.12 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 32 Philippines 515.51 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 33 Armenia 498.58 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 34 Israel 492.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Gambia
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 169,331 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 52,913 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 2.85 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 72.81 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 974,422 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 3.03 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 5.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 15.60 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.47 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 11.89 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Gambia?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Gambia was 530.59 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Gambia?
- The highest recorded value was 595.85 current US$ per square kilometre in 1990.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Gambia?
- The lowest recorded value was -34.79 current US$ per square kilometre in 2017.
- How does Gambia rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- Gambia ranks 31st out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Gambia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 701.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Gambia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.