Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 6.67 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of, 1986–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Korea, Democratic People's Republic of recorded 6.67 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is up 184.9% on the previous year and down 56.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of peaked at 123.5 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014 and was at its lowest, -4.32 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2004.
That places Korea, Democratic People's Republic of 134th out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1986 | 4.73 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1987 | 82.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +1635.1% |
| 1988 | 29.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -63.9% |
| 1989 | 22.76 current US$ per square kilometre | -23.2% |
| 1991 | 0.4152 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.2% |
| 1992 | 27.16 current US$ per square kilometre | +6440.0% |
| 1993 | 26.33 current US$ per square kilometre | -3.1% |
| 1996 | 0.3322 current US$ per square kilometre | -98.7% |
| 1997 | 0.083 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.0% |
| 1998 | 0.6644 current US$ per square kilometre | +700.0% |
| 1999 | 0.5813 current US$ per square kilometre | -12.5% |
| 2000 | 14.04 current US$ per square kilometre | +2314.3% |
| 2001 | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.0% |
| 2002 | 3.9 current US$ per square kilometre | +74.1% |
| 2003 | -3.32 current US$ per square kilometre | -185.1% |
| 2004 | -4.32 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.0% |
| 2005 | -3.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -28.8% |
| 2006 | 5.07 current US$ per square kilometre | -264.9% |
| 2007 | 2.66 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.5% |
| 2008 | 10.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +287.5% |
| 2009 | 2.24 current US$ per square kilometre | -78.2% |
| 2010 | 5.81 current US$ per square kilometre | +159.3% |
| 2011 | 12.37 current US$ per square kilometre | +112.9% |
| 2012 | 10.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -14.1% |
| 2013 | 15.45 current US$ per square kilometre | +45.3% |
| 2014 | 123.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +699.5% |
| 2015 | 11 current US$ per square kilometre | -91.1% |
| 2016 | 7.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -33.1% |
| 2017 | 13.14 current US$ per square kilometre | +78.4% |
| 2018 | 14.5 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2019 | 12.78 current US$ per square kilometre | -11.9% |
| 2020 | 6.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -49.9% |
| 2021 | 3.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -47.5% |
| 2022 | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 2023 | 6.67 current US$ per square kilometre | +184.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 34.82 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.73 current US$ per square kilometre | 82.14 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
| 1990s | 7.94 current US$ per square kilometre | 0.083 current US$ per square kilometre | 27.16 current US$ per square kilometre | 7 |
| 2000s | 2.97 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.32 current US$ per square kilometre | 14.04 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 22.65 current US$ per square kilometre | 5.81 current US$ per square kilometre | 123.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 4.69 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.34 current US$ per square kilometre | 6.67 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
- 131 Mongolia 8.07 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 132 Chile 7.24 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 133 Micronesia, Federated States of 6.96 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 135 Tajikistan 6.47 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 136 Uruguay 6.37 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 137 Kiribati 6.15 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Korea, Democratic People's Republic of
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 26,363 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 999 current US$ (2015)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 1.27 million current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 452,292 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 556,002 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 199,133 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 803,033 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 185,326 current US$ (2021)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 21,444 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Norway 416,108 current US$ (2022)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of was 6.67 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
- The highest recorded value was 123.5 current US$ per square kilometre in 2014.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
- The lowest recorded value was -4.32 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004.
- How does Korea, Democratic People's Republic of rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- Korea, Democratic People's Republic of ranks 134th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Korea, Democratic People's Republic of?
- Over the last ten years it is down 56.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Korea, Democratic People's Republic of data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.