Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Malawi
Malawi: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 23.52 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Malawi, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Malawi recorded 23.52 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 414.3% on the previous year and up 3,795.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Malawi peaked at 162.39 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992 and was at its lowest, -10.61 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2010.
That places Malawi 112th out of 167 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Malawi, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 41.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +1011.4% |
| 1982 | 6.26 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.8% |
| 1983 | 35.11 current US$ per square kilometre | +461.0% |
| 1984 | 31.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.6% |
| 1985 | 34.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 1986 | 40.41 current US$ per square kilometre | +18.0% |
| 1987 | 52.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +30.4% |
| 1988 | 37.23 current US$ per square kilometre | -29.4% |
| 1989 | 55.26 current US$ per square kilometre | +48.4% |
| 1990 | 100.66 current US$ per square kilometre | +82.2% |
| 1991 | 103.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1992 | 162.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +57.0% |
| 1993 | 73.4 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.8% |
| 1994 | 12.83 current US$ per square kilometre | -82.5% |
| 1995 | 16.44 current US$ per square kilometre | +28.1% |
| 1996 | 26.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +61.3% |
| 1997 | 18.46 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.4% |
| 1998 | 6.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -67.2% |
| 1999 | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.4% |
| 2001 | 4.88 current US$ per square kilometre | +155.6% |
| 2002 | 53.56 current US$ per square kilometre | +997.8% |
| 2003 | 29.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -44.2% |
| 2004 | 13.68 current US$ per square kilometre | -54.3% |
| 2005 | 25.77 current US$ per square kilometre | +88.4% |
| 2006 | 6.36 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.3% |
| 2007 | 9.76 current US$ per square kilometre | +53.3% |
| 2008 | 9.55 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.2% |
| 2009 | 3.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -64.4% |
| 2010 | -10.61 current US$ per square kilometre | -412.5% |
| 2011 | 1.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -115.0% |
| 2012 | 0.3182 current US$ per square kilometre | -80.0% |
| 2013 | -0.6364 current US$ per square kilometre | -300.0% |
| 2014 | 0.7425 current US$ per square kilometre | -216.7% |
| 2015 | 0.2891 current US$ per square kilometre | -61.1% |
| 2016 | 0.2513 current US$ per square kilometre | -13.1% |
| 2017 | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +1176.8% |
| 2018 | 1.74 current US$ per square kilometre | -45.8% |
| 2019 | 0.8402 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.6% |
| 2020 | 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre | +223.3% |
| 2021 | 31.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +1060.2% |
| 2022 | 4.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -85.5% |
| 2023 | 23.52 current US$ per square kilometre | +414.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 33.76 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.71 current US$ per square kilometre | 55.26 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 52.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.91 current US$ per square kilometre | 162.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 17.43 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.39 current US$ per square kilometre | 53.56 current US$ per square kilometre | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.2265 current US$ per square kilometre | -10.61 current US$ per square kilometre | 3.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 15.58 current US$ per square kilometre | 2.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 31.52 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Malawi
- 109 East Timor 27.02 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 110 Pakistan 25.9 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 111 South Sudan 25.87 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 113 Honduras 22.81 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 114 Sierra Leone 21.86 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 115 Angola 21.61 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Malawi
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 239,066 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 3.64 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 9.93 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 152.37 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 1.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 61.90 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 2.22 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 40.03 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 1.48 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 43.98 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Malawi?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Malawi was 23.52 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Malawi?
- The highest recorded value was 162.39 current US$ per square kilometre in 1992.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Malawi?
- The lowest recorded value was -10.61 current US$ per square kilometre in 2010.
- How does Malawi rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- Malawi ranks 112th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Malawi?
- Over the last ten years it is up 3,795.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Malawi data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 43 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.