Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Nicaragua
Nicaragua: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per was 13.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Nicaragua, 1980–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$ per square kilometre.
Analysis
Nicaragua recorded 13.49 current US$ per square kilometre for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in 2023.
The figure is up 33.7% on the previous year and up 76.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Nicaragua peaked at 542.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004 and was at its lowest, 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre, in 2019.
Nicaragua ranks 124th of 167 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per in Nicaragua, year by year
| Year | current US$ per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1980 | 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre | — |
| 1981 | 11.22 current US$ per square kilometre | +170.0% |
| 1982 | 70.97 current US$ per square kilometre | +532.6% |
| 1983 | 72.54 current US$ per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1984 | 70.63 current US$ per square kilometre | -2.6% |
| 1985 | 58.25 current US$ per square kilometre | -17.5% |
| 1986 | 117.25 current US$ per square kilometre | +101.3% |
| 1987 | 76.53 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.7% |
| 1988 | 19.03 current US$ per square kilometre | -75.1% |
| 1989 | 29.58 current US$ per square kilometre | +55.5% |
| 1990 | 37.39 current US$ per square kilometre | +26.4% |
| 1991 | 35.9 current US$ per square kilometre | -4.0% |
| 1992 | 164.62 current US$ per square kilometre | +358.6% |
| 1993 | 98.64 current US$ per square kilometre | -40.1% |
| 1994 | 64.57 current US$ per square kilometre | -34.5% |
| 1995 | 132.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +104.8% |
| 1996 | 84.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -36.0% |
| 1997 | 10.05 current US$ per square kilometre | -88.1% |
| 1998 | 121.82 current US$ per square kilometre | +1111.6% |
| 1999 | 57.59 current US$ per square kilometre | -52.7% |
| 2000 | 27.84 current US$ per square kilometre | -51.7% |
| 2001 | 23.43 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.8% |
| 2002 | 7.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -68.8% |
| 2003 | 218.3 current US$ per square kilometre | +2885.2% |
| 2004 | 542.21 current US$ per square kilometre | +148.4% |
| 2005 | 16.04 current US$ per square kilometre | -97.0% |
| 2006 | 15.95 current US$ per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2007 | 24.18 current US$ per square kilometre | +51.6% |
| 2008 | 11.22 current US$ per square kilometre | -53.6% |
| 2009 | 9.39 current US$ per square kilometre | -16.3% |
| 2010 | 7.98 current US$ per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 2011 | 11.38 current US$ per square kilometre | +42.7% |
| 2012 | 8.31 current US$ per square kilometre | -27.0% |
| 2013 | 7.65 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 2014 | 8.48 current US$ per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2015 | 5.91 current US$ per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 2016 | 6.7 current US$ per square kilometre | +13.3% |
| 2017 | 6.15 current US$ per square kilometre | -8.3% |
| 2018 | 10.75 current US$ per square kilometre | +75.0% |
| 2019 | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | -84.0% |
| 2020 | 8.42 current US$ per square kilometre | +389.4% |
| 2021 | 54.02 current US$ per square kilometre | +541.8% |
| 2022 | 10.09 current US$ per square kilometre | -81.3% |
| 2023 | 13.49 current US$ per square kilometre | +33.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 53.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 4.15 current US$ per square kilometre | 117.25 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 80.74 current US$ per square kilometre | 10.05 current US$ per square kilometre | 164.62 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 89.59 current US$ per square kilometre | 7.31 current US$ per square kilometre | 542.21 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 7.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre | 11.38 current US$ per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 21.5 current US$ per square kilometre | 8.42 current US$ per square kilometre | 54.02 current US$ per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Nicaragua
- 121 Myanmar 15.27 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 122 Sudan 15.17 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 123 Malaysia 13.89 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 125 Brunei Darussalam 13.28 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 126 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 13.22 current US$ per square kilometre compare
- 127 Mozambique 12.35 current US$ per square kilometre compare
More aid effectiveness data for Nicaragua
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 537,376 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 445,050 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 5.18 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 58.39 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 7.70 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 4.33 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 1.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 485,801 current US$ (2022)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 644,273 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan 10.91 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Nicaragua?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per in Nicaragua was 13.49 current US$ per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Nicaragua?
- The highest recorded value was 542.21 current US$ per square kilometre in 2004.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per recorded in Nicaragua?
- The lowest recorded value was 1.72 current US$ per square kilometre in 2019.
- How does Nicaragua rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per?
- Nicaragua ranks 124th out of 167 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, france (current us$), per rising or falling in Nicaragua?
- Over the last ten years it is up 76.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Nicaragua data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 44 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France (current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.