Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps in Eswatini
Eswatini: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps was 178,216 current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps in Eswatini, 1967–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
In 2023, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Eswatini stood at 178,216 current US$.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 148.7% on the previous year and up 133.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Eswatini peaked at 13.00 million current US$ in 1979 and was at its lowest, -5.92 million current US$, in 2007.
That places Eswatini 136th out of 174 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1967 | 90,000 current US$ | — |
| 1968 | 60,000 current US$ | -33.3% |
| 1969 | 30,000 current US$ | -50.0% |
| 1970 | 40,000 current US$ | +33.3% |
| 1971 | 70,000 current US$ | +75.0% |
| 1972 | 70,000 current US$ | +0.0% |
| 1973 | 130,000 current US$ | +85.7% |
| 1974 | 500,000 current US$ | +284.6% |
| 1975 | 770,000 current US$ | +54.0% |
| 1976 | 1.13 million current US$ | +46.8% |
| 1977 | 1.12 million current US$ | -0.9% |
| 1978 | 12.82 million current US$ | +1044.6% |
| 1979 | 13.00 million current US$ | +1.4% |
| 1980 | 2.49 million current US$ | -80.8% |
| 1981 | 2.28 million current US$ | -8.4% |
| 1982 | 2.79 million current US$ | +22.4% |
| 1983 | 3.71 million current US$ | +33.0% |
| 1984 | 1.84 million current US$ | -50.4% |
| 1985 | 1.74 million current US$ | -5.4% |
| 1986 | 2.87 million current US$ | +64.9% |
| 1987 | 3.71 million current US$ | +29.3% |
| 1988 | 2.82 million current US$ | -24.0% |
| 1989 | 3.13 million current US$ | +11.0% |
| 1990 | 3.89 million current US$ | +24.3% |
| 1991 | 3.38 million current US$ | -13.1% |
| 1992 | 2.35 million current US$ | -30.5% |
| 1993 | 1.76 million current US$ | -25.1% |
| 1994 | 6.10 million current US$ | +246.6% |
| 1995 | 8.94 million current US$ | +46.6% |
| 1996 | 4.43 million current US$ | -50.4% |
| 1997 | -1.01 million current US$ | -122.8% |
| 1998 | -2.26 million current US$ | +123.8% |
| 1999 | 150,000 current US$ | -106.6% |
| 2000 | -870,000 current US$ | -680.0% |
| 2001 | -1.32 million current US$ | +51.7% |
| 2002 | -2.13 million current US$ | +61.4% |
| 2003 | -2.06 million current US$ | -3.3% |
| 2004 | -3.11 million current US$ | +51.0% |
| 2005 | -1.19 million current US$ | -61.7% |
| 2006 | -3.04 million current US$ | +155.5% |
| 2007 | -5.92 million current US$ | +94.7% |
| 2008 | -980,000 current US$ | -83.4% |
| 2009 | -240,000 current US$ | -75.5% |
| 2010 | -630,000 current US$ | +162.5% |
| 2011 | 710,000 current US$ | -212.7% |
| 2012 | -534,200 current US$ | -175.2% |
| 2013 | -538,603 current US$ | +0.8% |
| 2014 | -657,052 current US$ | +22.0% |
| 2015 | -621,015 current US$ | -5.5% |
| 2016 | -504,367 current US$ | -18.8% |
| 2017 | -158,949 current US$ | -68.5% |
| 2018 | -268,766 current US$ | +69.1% |
| 2019 | -113,022 current US$ | -57.9% |
| 2020 | -127,838 current US$ | +13.1% |
| 2021 | 209,543 current US$ | -263.9% |
| 2022 | -365,699 current US$ | -274.5% |
| 2023 | 178,216 current US$ | -148.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 60,000 current US$ | 30,000 current US$ | 90,000 current US$ | 3 |
| 1970s | 2.96 million current US$ | 40,000 current US$ | 13.00 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 2.74 million current US$ | 1.74 million current US$ | 3.71 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 2.77 million current US$ | -2.26 million current US$ | 8.94 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | -2.09 million current US$ | -5.92 million current US$ | -240,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | -331,597 current US$ | -657,052 current US$ | 710,000 current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | -26,444 current US$ | -365,699 current US$ | 209,543 current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
More aid effectiveness data for Eswatini
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 24,761 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 1,889 current US$ (2017)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 585,648 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 13.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 912,632 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany 178,216 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 7.79 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 165,318 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy -567,147 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -415,180 current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Eswatini?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Eswatini was 178,216 current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 13.00 million current US$ in 1979.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was -5.92 million current US$ in 2007.
- How does Eswatini rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
- Eswatini ranks 136th out of 174 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Eswatini?
- Over the last ten years it is up 133.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 57 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.