Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps in Pakistan
Pakistan: Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps was -14.62 million current US$ in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps in Pakistan, 1960–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in current US$.
Analysis
The most recent figure for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Pakistan is -14.62 million current US$, measured in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 123.8% on the previous year and down 115.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Pakistan peaked at 147.33 million current US$ in 2021 and was at its lowest, -26.58 million current US$, in 1997.
Pakistan ranks 172nd of 174 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps in Pakistan, year by year
| Year | current US$ | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 160,000 current US$ | — |
| 1961 | 5.33 million current US$ | +3231.2% |
| 1962 | 19.73 million current US$ | +270.2% |
| 1963 | 42.01 million current US$ | +112.9% |
| 1964 | 46.04 million current US$ | +9.6% |
| 1965 | 42.29 million current US$ | -8.1% |
| 1966 | 23.94 million current US$ | -43.4% |
| 1967 | 19.80 million current US$ | -17.3% |
| 1968 | 32.10 million current US$ | +62.1% |
| 1969 | 28.55 million current US$ | -11.1% |
| 1970 | 37.29 million current US$ | +30.6% |
| 1971 | 66.80 million current US$ | +79.1% |
| 1972 | 41.61 million current US$ | -37.7% |
| 1973 | 6.63 million current US$ | -84.1% |
| 1974 | 76.40 million current US$ | +1052.3% |
| 1975 | 51.22 million current US$ | -33.0% |
| 1976 | -8.25 million current US$ | -116.1% |
| 1977 | 38.54 million current US$ | -567.2% |
| 1978 | 42.60 million current US$ | +10.5% |
| 1979 | 19.10 million current US$ | -55.2% |
| 1980 | 25.68 million current US$ | +34.5% |
| 1981 | 33.51 million current US$ | +30.5% |
| 1982 | 30.52 million current US$ | -8.9% |
| 1983 | 9.05 million current US$ | -70.3% |
| 1984 | 34.60 million current US$ | +282.3% |
| 1985 | 73.99 million current US$ | +113.8% |
| 1986 | 74.89 million current US$ | +1.2% |
| 1987 | 50.50 million current US$ | -32.6% |
| 1988 | 96.56 million current US$ | +91.2% |
| 1989 | 54.22 million current US$ | -43.8% |
| 1990 | 124.09 million current US$ | +128.9% |
| 1991 | 79.26 million current US$ | -36.1% |
| 1992 | 79.64 million current US$ | +0.5% |
| 1993 | 38.51 million current US$ | -51.6% |
| 1994 | 86.54 million current US$ | +124.7% |
| 1995 | 21.43 million current US$ | -75.2% |
| 1996 | 15.82 million current US$ | -26.2% |
| 1997 | -26.58 million current US$ | -268.0% |
| 1998 | -21.20 million current US$ | -20.2% |
| 1999 | 83.43 million current US$ | -493.5% |
| 2000 | 2.43 million current US$ | -97.1% |
| 2001 | 20.10 million current US$ | +727.2% |
| 2002 | 76.18 million current US$ | +279.0% |
| 2003 | -4.66 million current US$ | -106.1% |
| 2004 | 20.41 million current US$ | -538.0% |
| 2005 | 34.11 million current US$ | +67.1% |
| 2006 | 59.47 million current US$ | +74.3% |
| 2007 | 62.43 million current US$ | +5.0% |
| 2008 | 89.03 million current US$ | +42.6% |
| 2009 | 107.45 million current US$ | +20.7% |
| 2010 | 142.10 million current US$ | +32.2% |
| 2011 | 125.66 million current US$ | -11.6% |
| 2012 | 101.93 million current US$ | -18.9% |
| 2013 | 93.33 million current US$ | -8.4% |
| 2014 | 124.01 million current US$ | +32.9% |
| 2015 | 98.89 million current US$ | -20.3% |
| 2016 | 130.77 million current US$ | +32.2% |
| 2017 | 121.05 million current US$ | -7.4% |
| 2018 | 72.27 million current US$ | -40.3% |
| 2019 | 48.74 million current US$ | -32.6% |
| 2020 | 113.92 million current US$ | +133.7% |
| 2021 | 147.33 million current US$ | +29.3% |
| 2022 | 61.43 million current US$ | -58.3% |
| 2023 | -14.62 million current US$ | -123.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 26.00 million current US$ | 160,000 current US$ | 46.04 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1970s | 37.19 million current US$ | -8.25 million current US$ | 76.40 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1980s | 48.35 million current US$ | 9.05 million current US$ | 96.56 million current US$ | 10 |
| 1990s | 48.09 million current US$ | -26.58 million current US$ | 124.09 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2000s | 46.70 million current US$ | -4.66 million current US$ | 107.45 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2010s | 105.87 million current US$ | 48.74 million current US$ | 142.10 million current US$ | 10 |
| 2020s | 77.01 million current US$ | -14.62 million current US$ | 147.33 million current US$ | 4 |
Countries ranked near Pakistan
More aid effectiveness data for Pakistan
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Austria 7.92 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Belgium 28,763 current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Canada 31.21 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, European Union institutions 102.58 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Switzerland 2.31 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany -14.62 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, France 19.96 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, United Kingdom 84.45 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Italy 13.81 million current US$ (2023)
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Japan -138.02 million current US$ (2023)
Frequently asked questions
- What is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Pakistan?
- Net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps in Pakistan was -14.62 million current US$ in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps recorded in Pakistan?
- The highest recorded value was 147.33 million current US$ in 2021.
- What is the lowest net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps recorded in Pakistan?
- The lowest recorded value was -26.58 million current US$ in 1997.
- How does Pakistan rank for net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps?
- Pakistan ranks 172nd out of 174 countries with data for 2023.
- Is net bilateral aid flows from dac donors, germany (current us$), gaps rising or falling in Pakistan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 115.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Pakistan data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 64 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.
Computed from
- Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany Development Assistance Committee, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Net bilateral aid flows from DAC donors, Germany (current US$) with 152 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.